期刊文献+

如何在Cochrane系统评价中设计资料提取表 被引量:11

How to Design the Data Collection Form in Cochrane Systematic Reviews
原文传递
导出
摘要 资料提取表是原始研究与系统评价最终报告之间的桥梁,是资料分析的基础,直接关系到系统评价的结果结论,在系统评价中有着重要的地位和作用。Cochrane系统评价对资料提取表有严格要求,本文介绍笔者在进行Cochrane系统评价时设计资料提取表的一些经验和体会。 The data collection form is a bridge in-between the original studies and the final systematic reviews.It's the basis for data analyses,directly related to the results and conclusions of systematic reviews,and plays an important role in systematic reviews.There are strict requirements of data collection forms in making Cochrane systematic reviews.In this article,the authors introduce their experiences regarding to the design of data collection form.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2011年第3期341-345,共5页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 全国"大学生创新性实验计划"资助项目(编号:101061001) 中国循证医学中心CMB基金资助项目(编号:SR0510)
关键词 系统评价 资料提取 资料提取表 设计原则 Systematic review Data extraction Data collection form Design principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献10

  • 1劳力行.提高中医药临床研究报道质量的建议[J].中西医结合学报,2004,2(6):402-406. 被引量:15
  • 2朱军,李西钢,郭彤.一种阵列感应线圈系简介[J].测井技术,1995,19(4):271-276. 被引量:3
  • 3Guyatt GH, Keller JL, Jaeschke R, Rosenbloom D, Adachi JD, Newhouse MT. The n-of-1 randomized controlled trial: clinical usefulness. Our three-year experience[J]. Ann Intern Med,1990; 112(4): 293-299.
  • 4Evidence Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-Based Medicine: A New Approach to the Teaching of Medicine[J]. JAMA, 1992; 268: 2420-2425.
  • 5Gordon GH. Rennie D, Editors, The Evidence-based Medicine Working Group. Users'Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice[M]. AMA Press, Chicago, 2002.
  • 6Guyatt GH, O Meade M, Jaeschke RZ. Practitioners of evidence based care, not all clinicians need to appraise evidence from scratch but all need some skills[J]. BMJ, 2000; 320: 954-955.
  • 7Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.0[updated July 1999], In: Review Manager(Revwan) [Computer program]. Version 4.0, Oxford,England: The Cochrane Collaboration, 1999.
  • 8Reviews and Dissemination (CRD). Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness. CRD's Guidante for Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. 2nd Edition. CRD Report No. 4. York: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2000.
  • 9Higgins J and Hopewell S. Bias susceptibility in Cochrane reviews. Cochrane News 34, 1, 5.
  • 10梁传余,陈娜.我国耳鼻咽喉科防治性研究随机对照试验现况[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2002,37(1):60-63. 被引量:4

共引文献56

同被引文献156

引证文献11

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部