期刊文献+

X射线影像对比度细节体模的设计 被引量:2

Design of contrast details phantom for X-ray image
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了评价医用X射线摄影影像质量,设计及制作了一种对比度细节体模。利用X射线透过物质时其透过剂量随物质厚度的增加呈指数减弱原理,在与肌肉组织对X射线减弱特性基本等效的有机玻璃板上加工不同大小和深度的圆孔而制成。对比度细节圆孔在对比度阈值区域精密分布,对比度细节从0.3~80.0mm,同时提出了对比度细节体模影像质量指数的计算方法及体模的应用。该体模使用方便,指标计算简单,适合对X射线影像质量的对比度及空间分辨率的综合评价。 In order to evaluate the quality of medical X-ray photography image,the authors design and manufacture a contrast details phantom.The phantom has been prepared with the principle that the transmission dose of X-ray decrease with increasing the material thickness according to an exponential relationship,and with organic glass different size and depth of round hole,which has almost the same characteristics of X-ray abate as that of muscle tissue.The contrast details round holes from 0.3 mm to 80.0 mm distributed precisely in contrast threshold region.At the same time,the quality factor calculation of contrast details phantom image has been put forward quality,and the phantom applications have been introduced.The phantom design can meet X-ray image quality inspection requirements.The phantom is easy to use,simple to calculate factors,and it is suitable for comprehensively evaluating the contrast and spatial resolution of X-ray image quality.
作者 鄢铃 林滔
出处 《中国测试》 CAS 2011年第2期21-24,共4页 China Measurement & Test
关键词 对比度 对比度-细节 阈值对比度 体模 影像质量指数(IQF) contrast contrast detail threshold contrast phantom image quality factor(IQF)
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献31

  • 1曾勇明,陈亮,陆云峰.CR图像噪声的原因及抑制方法[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(z2):148-149. 被引量:9
  • 2王鹏程,张富利,李士俊.两种数字化X射线摄影技术影像质量与成像剂量的比较[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2005,25(1):91-93. 被引量:40
  • 3李泽洪,李祥林,于俊风,王爱玲,李建平.CR系统的科学使用与维护保养探讨[J].医学影像学杂志,2005,15(2):174-175. 被引量:8
  • 4卫阿盈.数字化影像设备CR和DR[J].医疗卫生装备,2006,27(2):55-56. 被引量:45
  • 5Hakan G. Image quality vs radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study. Eur Radiol,2001,11:1704-1709.
  • 6Frank F, Jens R. Flat panel digital radiography compared to storage phosphor computed radilography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies. Invest Radiol, 2002,37: 609-614.
  • 7Samei E,Flynn MJ.An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.Med Phys,2002,29:447-459.
  • 8Samei E,Flynn MJ.An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.Med Phys,2003,30:608-622.
  • 9Spahn M,Strotzer M,Volk M,et al.Digital radiography with a largearea,amorphous-silicon,flat-panel X-ray detector system.Invest Radiol,2000,35:260-266.
  • 10Geijer H,Karl-Wilhelm B,Anderson T,et al.Image quality vs radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector:a phantom study.Eur Radiol,2001,11:1704-1709.

共引文献74

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部