期刊文献+

使用涡轮钻微创拔除142例下颌低位阻生智齿临床研究 被引量:17

Clinical study of 142 lower impacted teeth atraumatic extraction using turbine drill
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较高速涡轮钻微创法与传统凿骨劈冠法在低位埋伏下颌阻生智齿拔除中的临床效果。方法选择口腔门诊142颗下颌埋伏阻生智齿,随机分为微创组与对照组。微创组用高速涡轮牙钻去除骨阻力并分割牙齿,拔除低位埋伏阻生智齿71例;对照组用传统的凿骨劈冠法拔除低位埋伏阻生智齿71例。两组患者术后牙槽窝内均未放入任何药物,严密缝合拔牙创面。术后常规给予消炎药物,拔牙术后1、3、7 d各复诊1次,并记录相应的主诉、症状和体征。结果微创组患者术后疼痛、肿胀、张口受限反应较轻,舌侧骨板折裂和干槽症的发生率明显低于传统的凿骨劈冠法。结论使用高速涡轮钻微创拔除下颌低位阻生智齿,手术难度降低,创伤小,操作简单,可明显降低术后并发症的发生,是一种优于传统劈冠凿骨法的较安全、可靠的拔牙方法,值得基层医院开展。 Aim To contrast the clinical effect of atraumatic extraction and traditional extraction for mandibular impacted teeth.Methods 142 impacted mandibular wisdom teeth were randomly divided into two groups:atraumatic group(turbine drill exodontia)and control group(traditional hammer and chisel exodontia).Then clinical complications were observed at postoperation 1st,3rd,7th day.Results Complications of postoperative pain,swelling and trismus had significant differences in two groups,especially break of lingual alveolar bone and dry socket.Conclusion Turbine drill applied in extraction of impacted teeth can efficiently cut complications of operation and postoperation.Therefore,atraumatic extraction is recommendable.
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2011年第3期340-341,共2页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 微创拔牙 低位阻生智齿 涡轮钻 atraumatic extraction lower impacted wisdom teeth turbine drill
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1邱蔚六.口腔颌面外科学[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2004:292.
  • 2Bouloux GF,Steed MB,Perciaccante VJ.Complications of third molar surgery[J].Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am,2007,19(1):117-28.
  • 3周宏志,胡开进,秦瑞峰,孔亮.下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度预判[J].口腔医学研究,2009,25(3):327-329. 被引量:27
  • 4Renton T,Smeeton N,Mc Gurk M.Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery[J].Br Dent J,2001,190(11):607-10.
  • 5Kilpatrick HC.Removal of impacted third molar utilizing speed up to 200000 rpm[J].Oral Surg,1958(11):364.
  • 6阚存辉,王银龙,何家才,周健.拔牙术后面部肿胀的几种相关因素的分析[J].安徽医药,2007,11(3):232-233. 被引量:13

二级参考文献13

  • 1Garc′ia-Garc′ia A,Gude Sampedro F,G′andara Rey J,et al.Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2000,83:585-587.
  • 2Diniz-Freitas M,Lago-Mendez L,Gude-Sampedro F,et al.Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,45(1):23-26.
  • 3Susarla SM,Dodson TB.Preoperative computed tomography imaging in the management of impacted mandibular third molars[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65(1):83-88.
  • 4Gbotolorun OM,Arotiba GT,Ladeinde AL.Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65(10):1977-1983.
  • 5Susarla SM,Dodson TB.How well do clinicians estimate third molar extraction difficulty[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2005,63(2):191-199.
  • 6Yuasa H,Kawai T,Sugiura M.Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2002,40(1):26-31.
  • 7孟凡文,胡开进,胡坤,陈云俊,吴占敖.无痛微创拔牙技术在齿槽外科的应用[J].口腔医学研究,2007,23(4):431-433. 被引量:44
  • 8Ustun Y,Erdogan O,Esen E,et al.Comparison of the effects of 2dose of methylprednisolone on pain,swelling and trismus after third molar surgery.J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio Endod.2003,96:535-9.
  • 9皮昕.口腔解剖生理学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:170-1.
  • 10Schultze-Mosgan S,et al.Use of ibuprofen and methylprednisolone for the prevention of pain and swelling after removal impacted third molars.J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1995,53:2-6.

共引文献97

同被引文献99

引证文献17

二级引证文献135

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部