期刊文献+

战后中日主导产业与非主导产业的政策比较--基于产业政策史的视角 被引量:4

A Comparison of Postwar Sino-Japanese Policies towards Leading and Non-leading industries:From the Perspective of Industrial Policy History
下载PDF
导出
摘要 发展中国家和地区实现经济增长的最有效途径是优先发展引致决策最大化项目,即发挥主导作用的项目。自20世纪40年代中后期开始,中国和日本均实施了促进主导产业发展的产业政策,但两国实施这一政策获取的经济绩效却迥然不同。日本在较短的时间内实现了经济腾飞,最终完成了其经济发展的赶超目标,而中国却因为推行这一政策出现了严重的产业结构失衡。导致这一结果的最大原因固然存在于两国经济体制差异方面,但两国在产业政策实施过程中对待主导产业与非主导产业的政策上的差异则更是造成两国产业发展政策实施效果出现较大差别的根源。 The most effective way to realize economic growth in a developing economy is to first develop the leading industries. Since the mid 1940s,both China and Japan have adopted industrial policies to promote the development of leading industries. However,the results of the policies are quite different in the two nations. Japan achieved economic prosperity in a short time and realized its goal of economic catch-up. In contrast,the policy gave rise to serious imbalance in industrial structure in China. The biggest cause for the stark contrast lies no doubt in the different economic systems of the two nations,but their different attitudes towards leading and non-leading industries in the process of implementing the policy also act as a fundamental reason for the different results of industrial development.
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期47-53,共7页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 主导产业 非主导产业 产业政策 经济赶超 经济体制 leading industry non-leading industry industrial policy economic catch-up economic system
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献11

共引文献17

同被引文献66

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部