2Morrissey S. Research misconduct[ J]. Chemical & En- gineering News,2008,86 ( 25 ) : 10.
3Chaomei Chen. CiteSpace : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific litera- ture[ J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Techno|ogy ,2006.57 (3) :359 -377.
4Chen C. Searching for intellectual turning points: Pro- gressive knowledge domain visualization [ J ]. Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004, 101 ( suppl - 1 ) :5303 - 5310.
5Consoli L. Scientific misconduct and science ethics: a case study based approach[ Jl- Science and Engineering Ethics ,2006,12 ( 3 ) :533 - 541.
6Kansu E,Ruacan S. Research ethics and scientific mis- conduct in biomedical research [ A ]. Kanpolat Y. Re- search and Publishing in Neurosurgery, [ C ]. Springer - Verlag Wien : Vienna,2002,11 - 15.
7Fatovic -Ferencic S. Scientific misconduct and theft: case report from 17th century [ J ]. Croatian Medical Journal ,2008,49 ( 1 ) :87 - 90.
8Ehringhaus S H,Ciechanover A J, Hulse R A,et al. No- bel round -table discussion 2: conflicts of interest, sci- entific misconduct, fair sharing, and intellectual proper- ty in an interdisciplinary/inter - institutional consortium[ J ]. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 2006, 231 (7) :1240 - 1254.
9Van der Weyden M B. Preventing and processing re- search misconduct: a new Australian code for responsi- ble research [ J ]. Medical Journal of Australia, 2006, 184(9) :430 -431.
10Niece B. K. Who is responsible for a fraud: an exercise examining research misconduct and the obligations of au- thorship through case studies [ J ]. Journal of Chemical Education ,2005,82 ( 10 ) : 1521 - 1522.
