期刊文献+

数学应用题中语言成分模型的构建——多元随机效应项目反应理论模型的运用 被引量:4

Modeling Language Components in Mathematical Items Using Multiple Random Effects IRT Models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 数学应用题中的语言成分可能对被试问题解决过程产生复杂影响。通常,这种影响对所有被试并非完全一致,而是具体数学题目特征与特定被试的认知特性之间交互作用的结果。本研究采用多元随机效应项目反应理论模型的建模方法,分析了数学应用题中语言成分对问题解决过程的影响。该方法的优势在于它不仅分析了语言成分对数学问题解决过程的平均效应,同时给出了相应的随机效应,揭示了相应成分对不同个体问题解决过程的具体影响程度。结果表明,较难的项目倾向于单词更多,命题密度更高,要求对图/表信息进行编码和转译,或者根据问题表述生成数学公式。项目命题密度影响效应存在着显著的个别差异。项目命题密度对能力较低的被试的影响高于对能力较高的被试的影响。 Language components in mathematical word problems may have profound impacts on the problem-solving processes engaged by examinees.When a math problem is presented by means of language statements,translation of these language statements into mathematical propositions must be carried out properly before relevant information can be integrated into a coherent representation of the problem.As many studies have shown,the impacts of such language components are unlikely to occur uniformly across examinees.Yet existing approaches that address this issue focus only on(1) examining the first-order correlation between the reading and mathematical abilities of examinees,(2) identifying a general language factor through factor analysis,and(3) examining the average impacts of specific language features on math item properties through linear regression or linear logistic test model(LLTM).While the first two approaches fall short of providing targeted information about the specific aspects of language components that impact examinees' mathematical problem solving,the third approach is based on an unrealistic assumption of constant impacts of such language components.Therefore,an alternative approach needs to be formulated in order to model individual-specific impacts of particular language features on math item proficiency.The current study applies item response theory(IRT) models with multiple random effects to investigate the effects of language components in mathematical items on examinees' performances.This approach starts by studying relevant literature and searching for a cognitive processing model for mathematical problem solving,and then identifies specific item stimulus features in the problem statements to represent the language components according to the model.By encoding items in a third-grade mathematical test according to the set of identified stimulus features,a set of models that operationalize different cognitive principles are then applied to the data obtained from the test.This approach provides a rigorous method for examining not only the average impacts of specific language features on item properties over the sample,but also variations of such impacts among examinees.Consequently,it allows researchers to investigate the interactions between the characteristics of a mathematical problem and the cognitive abilities of a particular examinee.Results from this study show that,among the six item stimulus features that were identified based on Mayer's cognitive theory of mathematical problem solving and its associated literature,all but one significantly affect the difficulty of mathematical items.Difficult items tend to have more words,feature a higher proposition density,and require the examinee to either translate information from a graph or table or to generate mathematical equations from the problem statements.In addition to the variation of mathematical ability across examinees,proposition density of the mathematical items shows differentiated impacts for different examinees in the testing sample.While the random effects of proposition density inversely relate to the mathematical abilities of examinees in general,proposition density exerts more impacts on the math problem solving for examinees with low abilities,and such impact is diminished as the examinee's ability increases.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期462-472,共11页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 上海市浦江人才计划项目资助
关键词 数学应用题 语言成分 命题密度 随机权重LLTM math word problem language component proposition density RW-LLTM
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 219-234.
  • 2Agresti, A. (2007). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons.
  • 3Aiken, L. R. (1972). Language factors in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 42, 359-385.
  • 4Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psvcholoeical Bulletin, 128, 612-637.
  • 5Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588 -606.
  • 6Boeck, P. D., & Wilson, M. (2004). Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York, NY: Springer.
  • 7Bovair, S., & Kieras, D. E. (1985). A guide to propositional analysis for research on technical prose. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (eds,). Understanding expository text. (pp. 315-362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 8Brown, C., Snodgrass, T., Kemper, S. J., Herman, R., & Covington, M. A. (2008). Automatic measurement of propositional idea density from part-of-speech tagging.Behavior Research Methods, 40, 540-545.
  • 9DeGuire, L. J. (1985). The structure of mathematical abilities: the view from factor analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  • 10Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179-197.

同被引文献82

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部