研发团队成员人格异质性与创新绩效:以交互记忆系统为中介变量被引量：15

Study on the Relationship between the Personality Heterogeneity and Innovation Performance of R&D Team:Taking Transactive Memory Systems as Intervening Variable

下载PDF

导出

摘要以2家科研机构中的35个研发团队,共496人为样本,运用"大五"人格量表测量研发团队成员的人格类型,并计算了团队人格异质性的H指标值。交互记忆系统作为中介变量,运用多元回归分析了研发团队成员人格异质性与团队创新绩效的关系。结果显示:研发团队的人格异质性与交互记忆系统强度、创新绩效呈正相关;交互记忆系统在研发团队的人格异质性与创新绩效之间起到部分中介作用。＂The big five＂ personality measurement table is used to measure the personality type of RD team and index H is calculated,and 496 samples are taken from 33 RD teams of 2 institutes.Taking transactive memory systems as intervening variable,the authors use multiple regressions to study the relationship between the personality heterogeneity and innovation performance of RD team.The result shows that the personality heterogeneity of RD team has positive relationship with the intensity of transactive memory systems and innovation performance and transactive memory systems play a partly intervening variable between personality heterogeneity and innovation performance.

作者黄海艳李乾文

机构地区南京审计学院管理学院

出处《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期186-191,共6页 Journal of Intelligence

基金国家自然科学基金资助"基于双元能力构建的公司创业导向与组织绩效转化路径研究"(编号:70972145) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目-青年基金项目资助"基于创业导向战略的企业SHRM匹配与绩效关系研究"(编号:08JC630046) 南京审计学院2009年度院级课题"无边界职业生涯时代研发人员主动离职影响因素研究"(编号:NSK2009/B10)

关键词成员异质性创新绩效交互记忆系统中介变量 personality heterogeneity innovation performance transactive memory systems intervening variable

分类号 C936 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献33

1Jackson S E, Joshi A, Erhardt N L. Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications [ J ]. Journal of Management, 2003,29 (6) : 801-830.
2Jackson S. Resume Differences Make a Sifference: Individual Dssimilarity and Group Heterogeneity as Correlates of Recruit- ment, Promotions and Turnover[ J]. Journal of Applied Psychol- ogy, 1991 (76) :675-689.
3Zenger T R, Lawrence B S. Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1989 (32) :353-376.
4Miller C, Burke L, Glick W. Cognitive Diversity Among Upperechelon Executives: Implications for Strategic Decision Processes [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998 ( 19 ) :39-58.
5Knight D, Pearce C L, Smith K G. Top Management Team Diversity, Group Process and Strategic Consensus [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999 ( 20 ) :445-465.
6张钢,熊立.成员异质性与团队绩效:以交互记忆系统为中介变量[J].科研管理,2009,30(1):71-80. 被引量：53
7王登峰.人格特质研究的大五因素分类[J].心理科学进展,1994,4(1):34-41. 被引量：59
8高笑,陈红.“大五”人格模型与工作绩效关系的研究进展[J].人类工效学,2007,13(3):67-69. 被引量：9
9Marks M A, Mathieu J E, Zaccaro S J. A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2001,36 ( 3 ) : 356 -376.
10Moreland R, Levine J. Problem identification by groups. Group Process and Productivity [ M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publi- cations, 1992 : 11-35.