期刊文献+

F1000的文献评价功能浅议 被引量:6

The Discussion of F1000's Literature Evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 F1000是一个新的科研文献在线评估系统,它提供了一种系统的结构化的专家评议机制。通过与ISIWeb Of Science中由被引次数所确定的影响力较高的文献对比,F1000的专家评议机制能够及时准确的对优秀文献做出推荐,并给出推荐的评语和文献重要程度等级,对文献质量的评定具有极高的参考性,也对科研工作者快速选择相关文献和重要文献具有重要意义。 F1000 is a new on-line literature awareness and assessment service of research papers.After comparing expert assessment with bibliometric indicators as tools to assess the quality and importance of scientific research papers,we found that the service offers a systematic and comprehensive form of post-publication peer review that focuses on the best papers regardless of the journal in which they are published.In addition,inferences about the relative importance of journals are set out,which should also interest biologists.
出处 《图书馆杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期38-42,47,共6页 Library Journal
关键词 F1000 专家评议 被引次数 F1000 Expert Review Cites
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1www. f1000medicine.com.
  • 2Lutz Bornmann, Hans - Dieter Daniel. Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post - doctoral research fellowship applicants[J].Scientometrics,2006,68 (12) : 427 -440.
  • 3Carrie L. lwema, Faculty of 1000 Biology[J]. Med Libr Assoc, 2008,96 (8) : 278 -279.
  • 4Kathleen W, Dave W, Jan V. Post - publication filtering and evaluation: Faeuhy of 1000 [J].Learned Publishing, 200316 (4) : 249 -258.
  • 5El - Munshid, H. Evaluation of peer review in biomedical publication. Editorial http://www, kfshrc, edu. sa/annals/ 215_216/01 -063R. htm.
  • 6微生物研究所.微生物所研究论文获Faculty of 1000 Biology推荐.2010-02-03http://www.biotech.org.cn/news/news/showphp?id=76233.
  • 7潘运宝,杨惠玲.miRNA与肿瘤干细胞的研究进展[J].国际内科学杂志,2009,36(9):548-550. 被引量:6
  • 8Martin, G. R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by ieratocarcinoma stem eells[J]. PNAS, 1981, 78 (06) : 7634-7638.
  • 9段志光,章娟,张妍.诺贝尔生理学或医学奖获得者科学论文质量的计量分析[J].科学技术哲学研究,2010,27(1):86-91. 被引量:8
  • 10蒋国华等.同行评议之路,科学计量学指标的应用,大学科研评价量化问题国际研讨会论文.1998.

二级参考文献51

共引文献68

同被引文献54

  • 1于淼,赵金环.出版后同行评议及其对国内学术出版的启示[J].中国科技期刊研究,2020,0(1):45-50. 被引量:15
  • 2李菁锦,张俊敏,陈瑞芳,慕萌,李晓菲,王翠英.MEDLINE收录期刊的标准与程序[J].首都医科大学学报,2009,30(2):264-265. 被引量:17
  • 3中国科技技术信息研究所将IM/Medline收录论文统计为国际统计源论文[J].中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2006,13(2):82-82. 被引量:5
  • 4金碧辉,张望,周秋菊.中国科学:前进中的“航母”——2006年SCI论文统计分析[J].科学观察,2007,2(1):20-44. 被引量:10
  • 5夏武青,葛芬,唐辉.医学F1000推荐文献的来源期刊分布[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2011,20(11) :59-62.
  • 6Reinstein A, Hasselback J R, Riley M E, et al. Pitfalls of using citation indices for making academic accounting promotion, tenure, teaching load, and merit pay decisions [J]. Issues in Accounting Education, 2011,26( 1 ) :99 - 131.
  • 7Psmeyers P, Burbules N C. How to improve your impact factor : Questioning the quantification of academic quality [ J ]. J Philos Educ, 2011,45(1) :1 - 17.
  • 8Waltman L,Costas R. F1000 recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation: a comparison with citations[ J]. J Am Soc InfSci Technol, 2014,65 (3) :433 -445.
  • 9Bommann L, Daniel H D. Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review-a citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 68 (12) :427 -440.
  • 10Wardle D A. Do "Faculty of 1000- (p1000) ranngs of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact[ J]. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution ,2010,3 (3) : 11 -15.

引证文献6

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部