摘要
传统经济学建立在自利性假设之上,认为参与人仅仅关心自身利益,即使出现有悖于自利性假设的行为,也只是暂时性的偏离。而最近二十多年的实验经济学研究对该假设提出了质疑,利用大量实验数据不仅证明了人类行为中公平偏好的存在性,而且还表明这种存在性绝非是暂时性的偏离,其对人类的行为决策具有很强的系统性影响。目前相关学术研究主要体现在公平偏好与其他社会偏好的区分、有关人类行为决策中公平偏好存在性的实验证明、基于结果的公平偏好与基于动机的公平偏好的差异以及公平偏好对传统激励契约产生的影响。本文指出了国外学术界对公平偏好实验中包括实验对象、货币金额和文化等方面的质疑,同时也揭示了未来进一步的研究方向,构成了有关公平偏好实验经济学的研究进展及前沿趋势。
Based on self-interested assumption,the traditional economics indicates that participants only care about their own interests.Even if contrary to the assumption of self-interested behavior,it is only a temporary deviation.However,the recent more than 20 years＇ experimental economic researches have challenged this assumption by using a large number of experimental data.Not only the existence of fairness preference has been demonstrated,but also it is not a temporary deviation.In fact,the fairness preference can exert a strong systemic effect on decision-making in human behaviors.The current related researches mainly focus on the distinction between fairness preference and the other social preferences,the experiments that have proved the existence of fairness preference in human behaviors,the difference between fairness preference based on results and fairness preference based on motives,and the impact of fairness preference on traditional incentive contracts.This paper points out the doubt of foreign academia about fairness preference experiments,including experimental object,monetary amount and cultural,etc.It also reveals the further research direction,these constitute the researches＇ dynamics and frontal trend of this field.
出处
《经济评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第3期124-130,共7页
Economic Review
关键词
公平偏好
传统经济学
实验经济学
最优契约
Fairness Preference
Traditional Economics
Experimental Economics
Optimal Contracts
