组织间信任研究述评被引量：15

A Review of Research on Inter-Organization Trust

下载PDF

导出

摘要随着组织联盟与合作的增多,组织间信任问题日益得到研究者关注。文章尝试从动、静态的角度对组织间信任的前因变量和结果变量进行梳理:单方组织层面的人口学特征及获得性特征,以及涉及双方互动层面的过去经历、目前状态及未来期望等因素会影响组织间信任的建立,降低双方合作的风险;而已经形成的组织间信任又会起到促进新知识的应用,提高联盟绩效及合作满意度的作用。今后的研究应关注组织信任的多层次分析、重视研究对象领域和地域的多样化以及互动(配对)和纵向数据的收集等。 As the alliance and cooperation between organizations increasing,inter-organizational trust has being drawn great attention of a great number of researchers.This paper attempts to sort out variables and outcome variables from both the dynamic and static perspective：demographic characteristics and acquired characteristics of the unilateral organizational level,past experience、current status and future expectations involving both levels will impede the construction of inter-organizational reliability,reducing the risk of cooperation;and the formed inter-organizational trust will serve to promote the application of new knowledge and increase the performance and satisfaction of the partners.Future research should focus on the multi-level analysis of inter-organizational trust;give weight to the fields and geographical diversification of objects and value dater collection form both interaction（matching） and longitudinal angles.

作者马华维杨柳姚琦

机构地区天津师范大学心理学系南开大学社会心理学系

出处《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2011年第2期186-191,共6页 Psychological Exploration

基金受教育部人文社会科学研究项目基金资助(09YJAXLX022)

关键词组织间信任人口学特征获得性特征联盟绩效合作满意度 inter-organizational trust demographic characteristics acquired characteristics alliance performance satisfaction of cooperation

分类号 B848 [哲学宗教—心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献32

1Contractor F J,Lorange P.The growth of alliances in the knowledge-based economy.International Business Review,2002,11(4):38-41.
2Dyer J H,Chu W.The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance:empirical evidence from the United States,Japan and Korea.Organization Science,2003,14(1):57-68.
3Krishnan R,Martin X.When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(5):894-917.
4Popp L,Zhou K Z,Ryu S.Alternative origins to interorganizational trust:an interdependence perspective on the shadow of the past and the shadow of the future.Organization Science,2008,19(1):39-55.
5Norman P M.Protecting knowledge in strategic alliances:Resource and relational characteristics.Journal of High Technology Management Research,2002,13(2):177-202.
6Zaheer A,McEvily B,Perrone V.Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance.Organization Science,1998,9(2):141-159.
7Lipper S K.Investigating postadoption utilization:an examination into the role of interorganizational and technology trust.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2007,54(3):468-482.
8Jong G D,Woolthuis R K.The institutional arrangements of innovation:antecedents and performance effects of trust in high-tech alliances.Industry and Innovation,2008,15(1):45-67.
9Doney P M,Cannon J P.An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships.Journal of Marketing,1997,61(1):35-51.
10Lane C,Bachmann R.Trust within and between organizations.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1998.

二级参考文献79

1高祥宇,卫民堂,李伟.信任促进两人层次知识转移的机制的研究[J].科学学研究,2005,23(3):394-400. 被引量：47
2魏江,王铜安.个体、群组、组织间知识转移影响因素的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2006,24(1):91-97. 被引量：78
3张志学,Paul S.Hempel,韩玉兰,邱静.高技术工作团队的交互记忆系统及其效果[J].心理学报,2006,38(2):271-280. 被引量：67
4Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-258.
5Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational Theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 496-515.
6Bacharach, S. B., & Bamberger, P. A. (2007). 9/11 and New York City firefighters' post hoc unit support and control climates: A context theory of the consequences of involvement in traumatic work-related events. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 849-868.
7Bamberger, P. (2008). Beyond contextualization: Using context theories to narrow the micro-macro gap in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 839-846.
8Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
9Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein, S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: CA: Sage.