摘要
通过研究欧盟、日本和我国实施全球化学品统一分类和标签制度(GHS)的基本情况,并从实施GHS的框架体系、实施GHS的时间节点、GHS的危险类别和GHS危险类别的判定,4个方面对欧盟、日本和我国实施GHS的现状进行重点研究。通过对比分析得出我国当前实施GHS主要存在4个方面的问题,即缺乏实施GHS的综合法律、实施GHS缓冲期的设置存在问题、缺乏开展GHS分类的配套指南、没有合理的运用"积木原则"。结合我国的实际情况提出3个方面的建议:适时推动我国GHS法律法规体系的建设、在各部门的协作下编制我国的GHS分类指南、合理的运用"积木原则"。通过分析表明:欧盟实施的GHS政策最为完善且力度最强,日本次之;由于充分利用"积木原则",欧盟的GHS类别与日中存在一定的差异;欧日中在数据运用和GHS危险判定原则上存在差异。
Current situation of implementing the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals（GHS） in European Union,Japan and China was studied.Emphasis was put on the study of frame system of implementing GHS,time node of implementing GHS,GHS hazardous categories,and the identification of GHS hazardous categories.Through comparative analysis,four problems existing in the implementation of GHS in China were summarized,including lack of comprehensive law in implementing GHS,improperly setting of grace period,lack of guidance on GHS classification and categorization,and irrational application of ＂block approach＂.According to China＇s actual situation,3 suggestions were presented,which includes promoting the building of GHS law system appropriately,compiling GHS classification guidance in collaboration with each department and building ＂block approach＂.Study also shows that EU is the most vigorous in implementing GHS with the best supporting policies and Japan comes second.EU differs from China and Japan in GHS categories in that EU utilizes ＂block approach＂,meanwhile,differences also exist in data using and the principles of the identification of GHS hazardous categories.
出处
《中国安全科学学报》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第1期147-153,共7页
China Safety Science Journal
关键词
化学品
全球化学品统一分类和标签制度(GHS)
体系
危险类别
积木原则
chemical
globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals（GHS）
system
hazardous category
block approach
