期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

性别刻板印象对注意定向和解脱的影响

The Impact of Gender Stereotype on Anttentional Engagement and Disengagement
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用注意线索任务分析了性别刻板印象对注意定向和解脱的影响,发现有效提示条件下刻板印象的激活可以加快被试的注意定向,使注意迅速指向与性别刻板印象一致的女性信息,但无效提示条件下,以上注意促进效应消失;对解脱量的进一步分析显示,在刻板不一致条件下,个体对于男性的解脱量显著高于对于女性的解脱量,表现出对于男性刻板不一致信息的解脱困难.结果表明:性别刻板印象对于注意的定向和解脱过程存在显著影响,并呈现出一种不同注意阶段、不同性别加工差异的特点. The present research used the attentional cueing task to examine and analyze the gender stereotype＇s impact on the attention processes,including attentional engagement and disengagement.The result indicated that the activation of the gender stereotyping process facilitated the attentional engagement by female stereotypic traits in the valid trial.However,this effect disappeared in the invalid trial.Further investigation of the value of disengagement showed a difficulty in attentional disengagement of the male stereotypic traits.This research gives an evidence that the gender stereotype has an interaction with the attentional engagement and disengagement and shows a processing discrepancy in different attentional stages via gender difference.
作者 李文福 贾磊 罗俊龙 张庆林
机构地区 西南大学心理学院
出处 《西南大学学报（自然科学版）》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期166-170,共5页 Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30970892) 西南大学"211工程"国家重点学科建设资助项目(NSKD08002) 西南大学研究生科技创新基金资助项目(ky2009015)
关键词 刻板印象 性别 注意线索任务 注意定向与解脱 stereotype gender attentional cueing task attentional engagement ＆ disengagement
分类号 B842 [哲学宗教—基础心理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1ARONSON E, WILSON T D, AKERT R M. Social Psychology [M]. Beijing:Pearson Education Asia Ltd and China Light Industry Press, 2006: 434--464.
  • 2HAMILTON D L, TROLIER T K. Stereotypes and Stereotyping: An Overview of the Cognitive Approach [C] //Dovidio J F, Gaertner S L. (Eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism. San Diego CA: Academic Press, 1986.. 127--163.
  • 3韩燕,邱江,张庆林.性别刻板化人名推测判断中的冲突效应[J].西南大学学报（自然科学版）,2008,30(10):164-168. 被引量：6
  • 4GILBERT D T, HIXON J G. The Trouble of Thinking: Activation and Application of Stereotypic Beliefs [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 60(4): 509--517.
  • 5BLAIR I V. The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice [J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2001, 6(3): 242--261.
  • 6PAYNE B K. Prejudice and Perception: The Role of Automatic and Controlled Processes in Misperceiving a Weapon [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81(2) : 181--192.
  • 7ITO T A, URLAND G R. Race and Gender on the Brain.. Electrocortieal Measures of Attention to the Race and Gender of Multiply Categorizable Individuals [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85(4) :616--626.
  • 8DONDERS N C, CORRELL J, WITTENBRINK B. Danger Stereotypes Predict Racially Biased Attentional Allocation [J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008, 44(5) : 1328-- 1333.
  • 9TRAWALTER S, TODD A R, BAIRD A A, et al. Attending to Threat: Race-Based Patterns of Selective Attention [J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008(44): 1322--1327.
  • 10AMODIO D M. The Social Neuroscience of Intergroup Relations [J]. European Review of Social Psychology, 2008(19) : 1--54.

二级参考文献35

  • 1张积家,刘红艳,叶倩仪.名字对个体吸引力的影响[J].应用心理学,2006,12(2):127-134. 被引量：21
  • 2[1]Most S B,Sorber A V,Cunningham J G.Auditory Stroop Reveals Implicit Gender Associations in Adults and Children[J].Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2007,43:287-294.
  • 3[3]Bernadette M.Schmitt M L,Munte T F.Electrophysiological Estimates of Biological and Syntactic Gender Violation During Pronoun Processing[J].Cognitive Brain Research,2002,14:333-346.
  • 4[4]Cacioppo J T,Crites S L Jr,Berntson G G,et al.If Attitudes Affect How Stimuli are Processed,Should They Not Affect the Event-Related Brain Potential?[J].Psychological Science,1993,4:108-112.
  • 5[5]Wicha N Y,Moreno E M,Kutas M.Anticipating Words and Their Gender:an Event-Related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration,Gender Expectancy and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading[J].Journal of Cognitive Neurscience,2004,16(7):1272-1288.
  • 6[6]Friederici A D,Alter K.Lateralization of Auditory Language Functions:A Dynamic Dual Pathway Model[J].Brain and Language,2004,89:267-276.
  • 7[7]Kuperberg G R,Sitnikova T,Caplan D,et al.Electrophysiological Distinctions in Processing Conceptual Relationships Within Simple Sentences[J].Cognitive Brain Research,2003,17:117-129.
  • 8[8]Hammer A,Jansma B M,Lamers M,et al.Pronominal Reference in Sentences About Personsor Things:an Electrophysiological Approach[J].J Cogn Neurosci,2005,17:227-239.
  • 9[9]Botvinick M M,Braver T S,Barch D M,et al.Conflict Monitoring and Cognitive Control[J].Psychological Review,2001,108(3):624-652.
  • 10[10]Botvinick M M,Cohen J D,Carter C S.Conflict Monitoring and Anterior Cingulated Cortex:an Update[J].Trends in Cognitive Science,2004,8(12):539-546.

共引文献13

西南大学学报（自然科学版）
2011年 第4期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部