期刊文献+

董事会治理与企业技术创新:理论与实证 被引量:46

Board of Directors Governance and Technological Innovation: Theory and Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在代理理论的框架内考察了公司治理之董事会治理与企业技术创新投入的关系,并基于2004-2008年501家中国上市公司的数据对此进行了实证研究。结果表明:1)董事会规模与企业技术创新投入存在不显著的负相关关系;2)独立董事占比与企业技术创新投入存在显著的正相关关系,独立董事占比较高的企业其技术创新投入要显著高于独立董事占比较低的企业;3)董事长与总经理两职分离的制度安排对企业技术创新投入有显著的积极影响,两职分离的企业其技术创新投入要显著高于两职合一的企业;4)董事会股权激励对企业技术创新存在积极影响,董事会股权激励水平越高,企业技术创新投入越多,但这种发现仅具有较低的统计显著性。 Based on agency theory,the paper investigates the relationship between Board of Directors governance and technological innovation,followed by empirical tests based on data from 501 Chinese listed companies through 2004-2008.The results are as follow: there is insignificantly negative correlation between the size of the Board of Directors and input of technological innovation;there exists a positive correlation between the appropriate proportion of independent directors and technological innovation input,the enterprises with a higher proportion of independent directors will invest in technological innovation significantly higher than those with a lower proportion of independent directors;the corporate leadership configuration of separation between CEO and the chairman of board of directors has positive impact on technological innovation;and there is a marginally significant impact of equity incentive of board of directors on technological innovation,the input of technological innovation increases with the magnitude of equity incentive of board of directors.
作者 赵旭峰 温军
出处 《当代经济科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期110-116,128,共7页 Modern Economic Science
关键词 董事会治理 技术创新 独立董事 Board of directors governance Technological innovation Independent directors
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Jensen M C, Meclding W. Theory of the finn: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976,3 : 305 - 360.
  • 2Zahra S A, Neubaum D O, Huse M. Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems[J]. Journal of Management, 2000,26(5) : 947 -976.
  • 3Hill C W L, Snell S A. External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1988, 9:577-590.
  • 4Baysinger B D, Kosnik R D, Turk T A. Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy[ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991,34 : 205 - 214.
  • 5Zahra S A. goverance,ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating impact of industry technological opportunities[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39:1713-1735.
  • 6David P, Hitt M A, Gimeno J. The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D [J]. The Academy of Management Journal,2001,44 : 144 - 157.
  • 7冯根福,温军.中国上市公司治理与企业技术创新关系的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2008(7):91-101. 被引量:544
  • 8Wu Hsueh - Lang. When does internal government make firms innovative? [ J ]. Journal of Business Research, 2007,13:1 -15.
  • 9Jensen M C. Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1986,76:323 - 339.
  • 10Stulz R M. Managerial control of voting rights: financing policies and the market for corporate control [J]. Journal of Finance Economics, 1988,20:25 - 54.

二级参考文献24

  • 1张宗益,张湄.关于高新技术企业公司治理与R&D投资行为的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(5):23-26. 被引量:85
  • 2杨建君,刘刃.外部董事数量与企业创新决策关系[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(6):45-48. 被引量:12
  • 3Shaker A. Zahra, et al. Entrepreneurship in Medium-size Companies: Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, (26).
  • 4Alchian,A.A.,and Demsetz,H. Production Information Cost, and Economic Organization [J]. American Economic Review, 1972, (62).
  • 5Wright et al. Impact of Corporate Insider, Blockholder and Institutional Equity Ownership On Finn Risk Taking [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,(39).
  • 6Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. Theory of the Finn: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, (3).
  • 7Francis, J. and Smith, A. Agency Costs and Innovation: Some Empirical Evidence [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1995, (19).
  • 8Hiroyuki Okamuro and Jian Xiong Zhang. Ownership Structure and R&D Investment of Japanese Start-up Finns [R]. Center for Economic Institutions Working Paper Series. Hitotsubashi University,2006.
  • 9John. A Pearce and Shaker A. Zahra. The Relative Power of CEOs Boards of Directors: Assocation with Corporate Performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12, (2).
  • 10Baysinger B. D., Kosnik R. D. and Turk T.A. Effects of Board and Ownership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991,(34).

同被引文献691

引证文献46

二级引证文献1314

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部