摘要
目的:为制定冠心病稳定型心绞痛(痰瘀互结证)自评量表,筛选、优化条目。方法:采用德尔菲(Delphi)法,在前期研究基础上编制《冠心病稳定型心绞痛(痰瘀互结证)自评量表专家问卷调查表》,向全国40余位专家发送3次问卷调查,并对其中第3轮问卷结果进行分析。结果:第3次调查问卷发出43份,收回有效问卷40份,专家积极系数为93.02%,专家总体权威系数为88.31%,专家意见的总体协调系数W为0.57,P<0.05。量表分疾病、体质2个维度,删除3个条目,确定胸痛、胸闷、诱因、运动耐量、气短、唇舌青紫、四肢沉重7个条目。结论:专家代表性强,积极性高,权威程度、协调性好,应用Delphi法对《冠心病稳定型心绞痛(痰瘀互结证)自评量表》条目筛选的结果可取。
Objective：This study aim to develop a stable angina （the syndrome of phlegm and blood stasis） self rating scale, sift items and get item weight. Methods ： Delphi method was applied to this research. All questionnaires were designed based on the former research and distributed to more than 40 experts 3 times. The results in the third times of survey were analyzed. Results ： Totally 40 valid questionnaires were received ,while 43 issued. The experts＇ activity index was 93.02% ,experts generally coefficient of authoritative was 88.31% ,The eoneent ration and coordination degree of the opinions of the expert s on this book was obviously high, W 0. 57, P 〈 0. 05. After the third Delphi process, there is 2 dimensions. 3 items were deleted and 7 items were-retained and translated into colloquial questions. Conclusion ： The reliability and coordination of the experts＇ advice is regarded to be high and harmonious. The result of sifting items constructed by Delphi is available.
出处
《辽宁中医杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2011年第5期827-829,共3页
Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
国家科技部重大新药创制专项课题(2009ZX09502-29)
关键词
德尔菲法
自评量表
冠心病
稳定型心绞痛
痰瘀互结
the Delphi method
self rating scale
Coronary heart disease （CHD）
Stable angina
the syndrome of phlegm and blood stasis in TCM
