摘要
宪法变迁是为了弥补社会实际与宪法规范之间的缝隙而产生的,它不同于宪法修改、宪法解释和违宪,宪法变迁属于一种具有法效力的客观事实,由此,宪法变迁必须接受法内在价值的评价。这也产生了宪法变迁的界限。宪法变迁不能违反宪法价值而导致违宪的结果,同时,宪法变迁在宪法文本的解释空间内进行,反之,应通过修宪来解决社会实际与宪法规范之间的落差。
Constitutional change is to make up for the gap between social fact and constitutional norm,which is different from constitutional amending,constitutional interpretation and violation of the constitution.So,constitutional change is a kind external fact with legal validity.Constitutional change must be evaluated by the value inherent in the law.This will bring a limit of constitutional change.Constitutional change can not violate constitutional value and become unconstitutional.At the same time,constitutional change must lie in the interpretational space of constitutional text.Otherwise,we should amend the constitution to make up for the gap between social fact and constitutional norm.
出处
《北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2011年第3期63-67,共5页
Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics：Social Sciences edition Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金重大招标项目(05&ZD024)
关键词
宪法变迁
宪法修改
宪法解释
违宪
constitutional change
constitutional amending
constitutional interpretation
violation of the constitution
