摘要
目的比较体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术（ONCABG）和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术（OPCABG）治疗冠心病的近期疗效。方法 2003年6月~2010年12月共对70例患者进行CABG,其中28例为ONCABG,42例为OPCABG,比较其术中、术后一些指标的差异性。结果 OPCABG组其呼吸机辅助时间、24 h胸腔引流量、24 h输血量、正性肌力药物应用、神经精神方面并发症、病死率等明显低于ONCABG组。结论两种手术方法均有效,但对高风险患者OPCABG更安全。
Objective To Compared with coronary artery bypass grafting（ONCABG）and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting（OPCABG）short-term treatment of coronary heart disease patients.MethodsFrom June 2003 to December 2010,a total of 70 patients were CABG,including 28 cases ONCABG,42 cases were OPCABG,compared postoperative differences in some indicators.ResultsOPCABG group of the mechanical ventilation time,24 hours of pleural drainage,24 hour blood transfusion,application of inotropic drugs,neuropsychiatric complications and death rate was significantly lower than ONCABG group.ConclusionTwo surgical methods are effective,but high-risk populations are more secure in OPCABG.
出处
《中外医学研究》
2011年第14期5-6,共2页
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
