期刊文献+

董事会结构、股权结构与中小企业绩效 被引量:8

Board Composition,Ownership Structure and Firm Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以中小企业板2004~2009年数据为基础,分析了中小上市企业董事会结构、股权结构与绩效之间的关系。实证结果表明,中小上市企业的董事会结构、股权结构与绩效之间的内生性特征不显著。董事会规模对Tobin’Q具有负向影响,对总资产收益率无显著影响。CEO双重性对Tobin’Q和总资产收益率分别具有负向影响和正向影响。董事会独立性对总资产收益率具有负向影响,对Tobin’Q无显著影响,表明独立董事在中小上市企业中并未起到有效的监督作用。Tobin’Q和股权集中度之间呈现显著的倒W形关系,但总资产收益率和股权集中度之间无显著相关性。Tobin’Q和总资产收益率与管理层持股之间均呈现显著的N形关系。 Based on a sample of listed small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs) in China during the period 2004-2009,this paper investigated the impact on firm performance from board composition and ownership structure.The result showed that there was no evidence that board composition and ownership structure of listed SMEs were endogenous.The strong negative relation existed between Tobin'Q and board size,while there was no statistically significant relationship between ROA and board size.CEO duality remained negative influence on Tobin'Q,and positive influence on ROA.Board independence had negative influence on ROA,and no significant influence on Tobin'Q,which meant the independent directors didn't play effective controlling role in listed SMEs in China.There was inverse W-shaped relationship between Tobin'Q and ownership concentration,while there was no statistically significant relationship between ROA and ownership concentration.Tobin'Q and ROA both significantly showed N-shaped relationship.
出处 《广东金融学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期16-33,共18页 Journal of Guangdong University of Finance
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71002104) 天津滨海新区科技特派员科技专项课题(SB20080097) 天津大学资助创新基金项目
关键词 中小企业 董事会结构 股权结构 企业绩效 small and medium-sized enterpirses board compostion ownership structure firm performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Pearce J.A.,Zahra S.A.,1992.Board Composition from a Strategic Contingency Perspective,Journal of Management Studies,Vol.29:411 -438.
  • 2Adams R.,Mehran H.,2003.Is Corporate Governance Different for Bank Holding Companies? Economic Policy Review,Vol.9:123-142.
  • 3Lefort F.,Urzua F.,2008.Board Independence,Firm Performance and Ownership Concentration:Evidence from Chile,Journal of Business Research,Vol.61:615-622.
  • 4Singh M.,Davidson Ⅲ W.N.,2003.Agency Costs,Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance Mechanisms,Journal of Banking & Finance,Vol.27:793-816.
  • 5Eisenberg T.,Sundgren S.,and Wells M.T.,1998.Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms,Journal of Financial Economics,Vol.48:35-54.
  • 6Ibrahim H.,Samad M.Amir A.,2008.Board Structure and Corporate Performance:Evidence from Public Listed Family-Ownership in Malaysia.http://ssrn.cony/abstract = 1292182.
  • 7Erickson J.,Park Y.W.,Reising J.,and Shin H.H.,2005.Board Composition and Firm Value under Concentrated Ownership:the Canadian Evidence,Pacific -Basin Finance Journal,Vol.13:387 -410.
  • 8余怒涛,沈中华,刘孟晖.董事会特征和盈余质量——来自沪深股市的证据[J].华东经济管理,2009,23(7):76-81. 被引量:5
  • 9白重恩,刘俏,陆洲,宋敏,张俊喜.中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究[J].经济研究,2005,40(2):81-91. 被引量:1335
  • 10Donaldson L.,Davis J.H.1991.Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory:CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns,Australian Journal of Management,Vol.16:49-95.

二级参考文献107

共引文献1455

同被引文献75

引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部