1Van de Bunt I,Van der Heide U A,kelelaars M,et al.Conventional confomal and in-tensity modulatedradiation tnerapy treatment planning of extenal beam radiotherapy for cervical canner the inpact of tum or regression[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Boilphys,2006,64(1):189-196.
3Mundt A J,Lujan A E,Rotmensch J,et al.Intensity modulated whole pelvic radiotheraphy in women with gynecologic madlignancies[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,52(5):1 330-1 337.
2Georg P, Georg D, Hillbrand M, et, al. Factors influencing bowel sparing in intensity modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynaecological malignancies [ J ]. Radiother Oncol,2006 ,80 ( 1 ) : 19 -26.
3van de Bunt L, van der Heide UA, Ketelaars M, et al. Conventional, confonnal, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: The impact of tumor regression[ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006,64 ( 1 ) : 189-196.
4Adli M, Mayr NA, Kaiser HS, et al. Does prone positioning reduce small bowel dose in pelvic radiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer[ J] .? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003,57 ( 1 ) :230-238.
5Huh SJ, Park W, Han Y. Interfraetional variation in position of the uterus during radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer[ J]. Radiother Oncol, 2004,71 ( 1 ) :73-79.
3Portelance I,Chao KS,Crigsby PW,et al.Intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)reduces small bowel,rectum,andbladder doses in patients with cervical cancer receiving pelvicand para-aortic irradiation[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001,51(1):261-266.
4Van de Bunt I,Van der Heide UA,Kelelaars M,et al.Conven-tional conformal and in-tensity modulated radiation therapy treat-ment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancerthe inpact of tum or regression[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,64(1):189-196.
