期刊文献+

采煤沉陷区复垦前后农业生态系统能值变化特征分析 被引量:3

Effects of reclamation of coal mining subsidence on emergy characteristics of agricultural ecosystem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用能值理论分析方法,比较采煤沉陷区复垦前后农业生态系统能值投入和输出,结果显示,复垦后的能值总投入是复垦前的2.7倍,能值总输出是复垦前的3.1倍,能值投入率是复垦前的7.4倍,说明复垦后的农、业生态系统经济发展水平有所提高;人均能值用量是复垦前的2.7倍,表明复垦后人民的生活水平得到改善;由于复垦后农业产业结构的多元化,各产业结构正处于发展中阶段,因此,净能值产出率由复垦前的0.28降低到复垦后的0.14,但环境负荷率由复垦前的0.5上升到复垦后的3.7,系统稳定性指数由复垦前的0.10上升到复垦后的0.36,从而说明,复垦后的农业生态系统相对复垦前循环利用率和持续发展程度较高。 Emergy theory and analysis method were employed to compare the effects of pre- and post-reclamation of coal mining subsidence on emergy inputs and outputs of agricultural-ecosystem. The results showed that after reclamation, the total emergy input and output were 2.7 times and 3.1 times of those before reclamation, respectively. Reclamation significantly increased the rate of emergy input (defined as [renewable organic energy + unrenewable source production] / [renewable environmental resource + nonrenewable environmental resource]), which was 7.4 times of that before reclamation, indicating reclamation promoted local economic development of agricultural ecosystem. Emergy consumption per capita increased by 2.7 folds, suggesting improved living levels of local residents. Diversification of the developing agricultural structure decreased the yield ratio of net emergy after reclamation. Accordingly, an increase was observed for environmental loading ratio from 0.5 to 3.7, and for system stability indices from 0. lto 0.36, suggesting reclamation of coal mining subsidence may improve the cyclic utilization efficiency and sustainability of agricultural ecosystem.
出处 《生态科学》 CSCD 2011年第3期334-339,共6页 Ecological Science
基金 国家科技支撑计划(2006BAC09B02) 山西省重大科技攻关项目(2006061099-01-02)
关键词 采煤沉陷 能值分析 农业生态系统 复垦 mining subsidence, emergy analysis, agricultural ecosystem, reclamation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献95

共引文献246

同被引文献92

  • 1李茜,毕如田.煤矿可持续发展与煤矿开采环境问题——21世纪初环境经济学面临的新机遇和挑战[J].生产力研究,2005(3):161-162. 被引量:9
  • 2李金平,陈飞鹏,王志石.城市环境经济能值综合和可持续性分析[J].生态学报,2006,26(2):439-448. 被引量:69
  • 3Jin' e Liu, Hongxia Zhou, Pei Qin, Jurl Zhou, Guoxiang Wan.Comparisons of ecosystem services a- mong three conversion systems in Yancheng National Nature Reserve [J].Ecological Engineering,2009, (35) :609-629.
  • 4Hui Yang, Li Chen, Zongcheng Yan, Honglin Wang.Emergy analysis of cassava chips-suitable feed- stock for fuel ethanol in China[J].Ecological Engineer- ing,2010, (36) : 1348-1354.
  • 5Hanfeng Mu,Xiao Feng,Khim Hoong Chu. Improved emergy indices for the evaluation of indus- trial systems incorporating waste management [J].Eco- logical Engineering, 2011, (37) : 335-342.
  • 6Xiao Hong Zhang,ShiHuai Deng,un Wu, Wenju Jiang.A sustainability analysis of a municipal sewage treatment ecosystem based on emergy [J].Eco- logical Engineering, 2010, (36) : 685-696.
  • 7Jinli Wang,Zhuoran Li,Xueyang Hu,Jun WangDezi Wang,Pei Qin.The ecological potential of a restored abandoned quarry ecosystem in Mt. Mufu,Nanjing, China [J].Ecological Engineering, 2011, (37) :833-841.
  • 8H.F.Lu, Z.H.Wang, D.E.Campbell,, H.Ren, J. Wang.Emergy and eco-exergy evaluation of four forest restoration modes in southeast China [J].Ecolog- ical Engineering, 2011, (37) : 277-285.
  • 9Odum H T, Odum E C. Ecology and Economy: "Emergy" Analysis and Public Policy in Texas. Texas: The Office of Natural Resources and Texas Department of Agriculture, Austin, 1987, 163-171.
  • 10Odum H T. Serf-organization, transformity and information. Science, 1988, 242(4882) : 1132-1139.

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部