期刊文献+

我国6省市人群的健康相关生命质量研究 被引量:86

Survey of health-related quality of life in population of 6 Chinese cities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的制定我国6省市人群的SF-36评价参考值,评估我国不同人群的生命质量。方法利用36条目简明量表(SF-36),研究整体人群和不同人群的得分。将整体人群的得分与香港、美国常模进行比较,并利用逐步回归的方法分析人口统计学特征对SF-36结果的影响。结果研究人群的生理领域和心理领域生命质量的得分分别为77.54±15.96和71.29±17.86。SF-36各维度得分的变化趋势接近于香港地区常模的评价结果。人群的性别、年龄、地域分布及城乡分布等均对SF-36的得分有影响。结论 SF-36量表可以用于评估健康状况对生命质量的影响,应根据人口统计学特征制定我国不同人群的常模。 Objective To define the normative values of the SF-36 health survey in 6 Chinese cities so that we can evaluate the quality of life in different Chinese populations.Methods We scored 8 domains of the SF-36 from general population and different groups.The score of the general population was compared with the norms of Hong Kong and US.The stepwise regression analysis was used to calculate the effects of demographic variables on the SF-36 scale scores.Results The score on physical health is 77.54±15.96 and on mental health is 71.29±17.86.All sub-scales scores showed similar trend of change between Chinese general population and Hong Kong general norm.Gender,age and living environment had effects on the SF-36 scores.Conclusion SF-36 health survey can be used to evaluated the impact of health statement on life quality.We can develop the norms of SF-36 by different demographic groups.
出处 《基础医学与临床》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期636-641,共6页 Basic and Clinical Medicine
基金 国家高科技研究发展计划(863)2006AA022428
关键词 生命质量 36条目简明量表 评价参考值 预测因素 quality of life SF-36 Norm predictive factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 12010中国卫生统计年鉴.
  • 2李宁秀,刘朝杰,李俊,任晓晖.四川省城乡居民SF-36评价参考值[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,32(1):43-47. 被引量:396
  • 3Lain CLK, Lauder IJ, tam TP, et al. Population based norruing of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 health survey [ J ]. HK Pract, 1999,21:460 - 470.
  • 4Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide [ M ]. Boston:New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, 1993.
  • 5朱燕波,王琦,陈柯帆,骆晓霞,唐芳.一般人群健康相关生命质量的预测因素[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2009,18(3):254-259. 被引量:96
  • 6刘朝杰,李宁秀,任晓晖,李俊,张骏,孙丁.36条目简明量表在中国人群中的适用性研究[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,32(1):39-42. 被引量:311
  • 7Asronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PDA, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the dutch language version of the SF-36 health survey in community and chronic disease populations[ J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51 : 1055 - 1068.
  • 8Persson L, Karlsson J, Bengtsson C. et al. The swedish SF- 36 health survey Ⅱ , evaluation of clinical validity: results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenborg [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51 : 1095 - 1103.
  • 9Nelson EC, Landgraf JM, Hays RD, et al. The functional status of patients: How can it be measured in physicians' offices? [J]. Med Care, 1990,28 : 1111 - 1126.
  • 10Power F, Matthews S, Manor O. Inequalities in self-rated health explanation from different stages of life [ J ]. Lancet, 1998,351 : 1009 - 1014.

二级参考文献12

共引文献751

同被引文献811

引证文献86

二级引证文献605

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部