期刊文献+

应用颈椎动态稳定器治疗颈椎间盘突出症的早期临床效果观察 被引量:4

Early clinic report of cervical functional reconstruction with DCI internal fixation to treat cervical spondylosis caused by intervertebral disc degeneration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用颈椎动态稳定器(DCI)治疗颈椎间盘突出症的安全性及有效性。方法对16例颈椎间盘突出症患者均行经前路颈椎间盘切除、椎管减压后DCI植入术,采用VAS、PSI评分评价术前、术后1周、术后3个月及6个月的神经功能恢复情况。术前、术后常规X线片检查,Cobbs’法测量患者术前和术后C2到C7植入节段和植入邻近节段的运动范围。结果末次随访,患者术后上肢VAS评分平均改善4.9分,颈部VAS评分平均改善4.5分,术后患者平均PSI评分为1.6分。颈椎C2到C7的活动范围平均减少7.01°±6.65°(P<0.05);术后植入节段椎间隙的平均活动范围减少0.91°±0.57°(P<0.05);术后邻近节段的活动范围平均减少0.68°±0.38°(P>0.05)。手术有效率为100%。结论应用颈椎动态稳定器治疗颈椎间盘突出症,在保留颈椎一定生理活动度的情况下,并未增加手术邻近节段活动度,维持了颈椎稳定性,早期临床效果较好。 Objective To investigate the safety and efficiency of dynamic cervical implant(DCI)internal fixation to treat intervertebral disc degeneration.Methods There were sixteen patients who suffered herniation of cervical disc,each received DCI implantation.Use VAS and PSI scoring method to asscess neurofunctional recovery preoperatively and one week,three months,six months after operation.Routinely,the patients accepted X-ray examination preoperatively and postoperatively.We used Cobb's measurement to measure the ROM of C2-C7,implant segment and adjacent segment pre and postoperation.Results Last follow-up,the average VAS score improved 4.9 and 4.5 at upper limbs and neck,respectively.The average PSI score was 1.6.The average ROM of C2-C7 decreased 7.01°±6.65°(P0.05).The average ROM of implant segment decreased 0.91°±0.57°(P0.05).The average ROM of adjacent segment decreased 0.68°±0.38°(P0.05).The effective rate of operation was 100%.Conclusion Using dynamic cervical implant to treat intervertebral disc herniation retain the cervical biomechanical movement in some degree,while not increasing the ROM of adjacent segments.It can maintain the cervical stability,also has a good clinic outcome.
出处 《颈腰痛杂志》 2011年第3期163-167,共5页 The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
关键词 颈椎间盘突出症 颈椎动态稳定器 非融合技术 Intervertebral disc herniation dynamic cervical implant(DCI) nonfusion technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Thomé C,Leheta O,Krauss JK,et al.A prospective randomized comparison of rectangular titanium cage fusion and iliac crest autograft fusion in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2006,4:1-9.
  • 2钱军,申才良,田大胜.颈前路减压植骨融合内固定术对颈椎曲度和椎间高度的影响[J].颈腰痛杂志,2008,29(2):117-119. 被引量:18
  • 3Chang UK,Kim DH,Lee MC,et al.Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and Prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2007,7:40-46.
  • 4Robertson JT,Papadopoulos SM,Traynelis VC.Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty a prospective 2-year study[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2005,3:417-423.
  • 5Duggal N.Cervical disc arthroplasty:a practical overview[J].Spine,2009,20:216-221.
  • 6Huang RC,Girardi,FP,Lim MR,et al.Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery[J].Orthop Clin N Am,2005,36:263-269.
  • 7Cloward RB.The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks[J].J Neurosurg,1958,15:602-617.
  • 8程迅生,郑国海,吴成如,孙军战,吴端,赵光勋.颈前路减压植骨融合钢板内固定术治疗脊髓型颈椎病[J].颈腰痛杂志,2009,30(4):320-323. 被引量:2
  • 9Kasimatis GB,Michopoulou S,Boniatis I,et al.The impact of fusion on adjacent levels in cervical spine injuries:Is it reallyimportant[J].Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2009,111(10):816-824.
  • 10曾岩,党耕町,马庆军.颈椎前路融合术后颈部运动功能的评价[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(24):1481-1484. 被引量:96

二级参考文献35

  • 1黄象望,张毅,刘向阳,肖晟,阎戈.ORION+钛网植骨在颈前路临床中的应用[J].颈腰痛杂志,2005,26(4):266-267. 被引量:8
  • 2卢一生,潘兵,许文根.颈前路间隙减压与开槽减压融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病[J].颈腰痛杂志,2007,28(4):283-285. 被引量:8
  • 3Smith GW,Robinson RA.The treatment of certain cervicalspine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion.J Bone Joint Surg(Am).1958;40-A(3):607-624.
  • 4Heller JG,Sasso RC,Papadopoulos SM,et al.Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthreplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion:clinical and radiographic results of a randomized,controlled,clinica.
  • 5Phillips FM,Allen TR,Regan JJ,et al.Cervical disc replacement in patients with and without previous adjacent level fusion surgery:a prospective study.Spine(Phila Pa 1976).2009;34(6):556-565.
  • 6Murrey D,Janssen M,Delamarter R,et al.Results of the prospective,randomized,controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replaceme.
  • 7Nasca RJ.Cervical radiculopathy:current diagnostic and treatment options.J Surg Orthop Adv.2009; 18(1):13-18.
  • 8Baba H,Furusawa N,Imura S,et al.Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy.Spine.1993;18(15):2167-2173.
  • 9Gore DR,Sepic SB.Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease:a report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years.Spine.1998;23(19):2047-2051.
  • 10Kulkarmi V,rajshekhar V,Raghuram L.Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy magnetic resonance maging study evidence.J Neurosurg.2004; 100(1 Supp.

共引文献130

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部