期刊文献+

MR T2加权成像与增强CT对原发直肠癌术前T分期诊断的比较 被引量:5

Diagnostic value of MR T2WI and contrast enhanced CT in the pre-operative T staging of primary rectal carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较MR T2WI和增强CT对原发直肠癌术前T分期的诊断效能。方法 51例经活检病理证实的原发直肠腺癌,术前其中27例接受常规MR检查,43例接受CT检查,19例接受MR和CT检查。用MR T2WI和增强CT图像对肿瘤浸润深度进行判断,并与术后病理结果对照。结果 MR T2WI对直肠癌术前T分期与术后病理的一致性优于增强CT(Kappa值0.72 vs 0.52,P<0.05),对原发直肠癌T1/T2和T3/T4分期准确率高于增强CT(88.89%vs79.07%);MR T2WI鉴别T1/T2、T3/T4期肿瘤的特异度(94.74%vs 81.25%)、阳性预测值(85.71%vs 57.14%)均优于增强CT。MR T2WI对T1/T2和T3/T4期肿瘤的分期效能优于CT。结论 MR T2WI在原发直肠癌术前T分期评价中的效能优于增强CT。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of pre-operative MR T2WI and contrast enhanced CT T staging of primary rectal cancer.Methods Fifty-one patients with primary rectal cancer were selected prospectively.Totally 27 patients underwent conventional MR and 43 patients underwent CT scan.Nineteen patients underwent both MR and CT scan.T2WI and contrast enhanced CT were used to determine T staging,respectively.Radical resection of rectal carcinoma was performed in all patients.Post-operative histopathological results were taken as reference.Results The concordance of T2WI preoperative T staging with postoperative pathology was better than that of contrast enhanced CT(Kappa value: 0.72 vs 0.52,P〈0.05).MR T2WI was superior to contrast enhanced CT in the differentiation between T1/T2 tumor and T3/T4 tumor(accuracy: 88.89% vs 79.07%;specificity: 94.74% vs 81.25%;positive predictive value: 85.71% vs 57.14%).ROC showed that the diagnostic efficacy of MR T2WI preoperative T staging was superior to that of contrast enhanced CT.Conclusion MR T2WI is more accurate than contrast enhanced CT in local T staging of rectal cancer,especially in assessment of T1/T2 and T3/T4 tumors.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期1213-1217,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 直肠肿瘤 磁共振成像 体层摄影术 X线计算机 肿瘤分期 诊断效能 Rectal neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging Tomography X-ray computed Neoplasm staging Diagnostic efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献59

共引文献120

同被引文献35

  • 1张怀宇,倪凤明,刘铜军.MRI常规序列+DWI在直肠癌术前T分期中的诊断价值[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(8):2100-2101. 被引量:5
  • 2GUIMARAES L S, FLETCHER J G, HARMSEN W S, et al. Ap- propriate patient selection at abdominal dual - energy CT using 80 kV: relationship between patient size, image noise, and image quality [ J ]. Radiol, 2010, 257 (3) : 732 - 742.
  • 3KONDO H, KANEMATSU M, GOSHIMA S, et al. Body size inde- xes for optimizinglodine dose for aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector CT: comparison of total body weight, lean txMy weight, and bhxt volume[J]. Radiol, 2010, 254(1): 163- 169.
  • 4SCHINDERA S T, DIEDRICHSEN L, MII,LER H C, et al. Al- gorithm fbr abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a pbantmn study[J]. Radiol, 2011 , 260(2) : 454 -462.
  • 5SUN C H, FENG S T, XIAO P, et al. Quantitative assessment of peirect',d tumor itdihration with dynamic contrast -enhanced multi - detector row CT in rectal cancer[ J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011 , 80(2) : 279 - 283.
  • 6POMERRI F, PUCCIARELLI S, GENNARO G, et al. Compari- son between CT volume measurement and histopathological assess- mentor" response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer[ J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81 (12) : 3918 -3924.
  • 7Engstrom PF,ArnoIetti JP,Benson AB,et a1.NCCN clinical practice guidelines inoncology:rectal cancer.J Natl compr Canc Netw,2009,7(8):838-881.
  • 8Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo,Yong-Geul Joh,Conor P Delaney.Surgical treatment for rectal cancer:An international perspective on what the medical gastroenterologist needs to know[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2008,14(21):3281-3289. 被引量:13
  • 9李德福,张敏.直肠癌淋巴结转移与临床病理特征分析(附79例报道)[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2008,15(9):652-655. 被引量:6
  • 10潘自来,张华,张欢,丁蓓,杜联军,宋琦,张燕,陈克敏.磁共振弥散加权序列对直肠癌术前分期评估的价值[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2008,14(6):588-592. 被引量:17

引证文献5

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部