摘要
目的比较微型钢板与克氏针内固定治疗掌(跖)、指(趾)骨骨折的疗效。方法对40例掌(跖)、指(趾)骨骨折分别采用手术切开复位微型钢板、克氏针内固定,并随访其骨折愈合情况及远期功能效果。结果两组病例均获随访,随访时间4～14个月,微型钢板组骨折均解剖复位,全部愈合,平均愈合时间5.1周。克氏针组3例延迟愈合,平均愈合时间8周。结论应用微型钢板内固定治疗手足部骨折,在表面刚度/固定的稳定性方面均优于克氏针内固定,为骨折的早期功能锻炼打下了坚实的基础。
[ Objective ] The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical results for open reduction and internal fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures using miniature plates vs Kirschner wire. [Methods] 40 cases were treated. The follow-up periods were 4 months to 14 months. [Results] All the fractures have recovered. In the plates group, the average recovered time was 5.1weeks. And in the kirschner wire group, the average recovered time was 8 weeks. [ Conclusion ] To evaluate the most common aspects, such as stability, stiffness, we find that it is satisfying that treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with miniature nlates than kirsehner wire.
出处
《中国现代医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第17期2066-2067,2071,共3页
China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词
掌(跖)
指(趾)骨骨折
微型钢板
克氏针
疗效
metacarpal and phalangeal fractures
miniature plates
kirschner wire
effects
