期刊文献+

360度绩效评价体系主体选择方法探讨——基于360度绩效评价体系系统误差研究 被引量:4

The Discussion of the Main Body's Choice Method about 360 Degree Achievements Appraisal System——Studies based on the System Error of 360 Degree Achievements Appraisal System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用各类主体在绩效评价中产生的绩效评估误差构建权重方程,讨论分析权重方程解的不同情况并据此探讨主体选择体系最佳或最满意的选择方式。在探讨过程中导出了360度评价体系全方位主体选择的适用范围,分析了其局限性和不适用范围以达到研究主要目的,针对360度评价体系的不足提出了在绩效评价主体选择中的相关建议。 The article uses the achievements appraisal error produced by each kind of main body in the performance evaluation system to create an weight equation.It discusses and analyzes the different situation of the error weight equation to make the best or the most satisfactory decision in the main body choice.In the discussion,the author find that 360 degree achievements appraisal system have its scope of application.This shows 360 degree achievements appraisal system has its limitation and its range,which achieves this article main purpose.The article also proposes some suggestion on the insufficiency of 360 degree performance appraisal system in the main body choice process of the performance evaluation.
出处 《经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第7期90-94,共5页 On Economic Problems
关键词 360度反馈 绩效评价 评价体系 误差 权重方程 360 degree feedback achievements appraisal appraisal system error weight equation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1London, Beatty. 360 Degree Feedback as a Competitive Ad- vantage [ J ]. Human Resource Management, 1993, (32) : 352 - 373.
  • 2O' Reilly B. 360 - degree Feedback can Change Your Life [J]. Fortune, 130 (8).
  • 3吴三清,杨杰,凌文辁.360度评价实践理性刍议[J].思想战线,2003,29(3):31-34. 被引量:13
  • 4Chambers B A, Schmitt N. Inequity in the Performance Evaluation Process: How Yon Rate Me Affects How I Rate You [ J ] . Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2002, 16(2): 103-112.
  • 5Griffin B W. Grading Leniency, Grade Discrepancy, and Student Ratings of Instruction[ J ]. Contemporary Education- al Psychology,2004,29 (4) :410 - 425.
  • 6Antonioni D. The Effects of Feedback Accountability on Upward Appraisal Ratings [ J ]. Personnel Psychology, 1994, 47(2) : 349 -356.
  • 7Hauenstein N. An Information -processing Approach to Leniency in Performance Judgments [ J ] . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1992, 77(4) : 485 -493.
  • 8Wayne S J, Liden R C. Effects of Impression Management on Performance Ratings: A Longitudinal Study [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995,38 ( 1 ) : 232 - 260.
  • 9Viswesvaran C, Schmidt F, Ones D S. Is there a General Factor in Ratings of Job Performance? a Metaanalytic Framework for Disentangling Substantive and Error Influ- ences [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, 90 ( 1 ) : 108 - 131.
  • 10Scullen S E, Mount M K, Judge T A. Evidence of the Construct Validity of Developmental Ratings of Managerial Performance[ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88 (1) : 50 -66.

二级参考文献11

共引文献83

同被引文献11

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部