期刊文献+

阑尾常规开腹手术与腹腔镜切除术的护理分析比较 被引量:16

Conventional open surgery and laparoscopic resection of nursing analysis contrast
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同手术方法进行阑尾炎切除术的术后不同护理方法对患者疗效及恢复的影响。方法:选取62例阑尾炎患者,按照自愿原则分为两组,A组28例,在腹腔镜下行阑尾切除术;B组34例,行传统阑尾切除术。术后观察指标住院天数、切口疼痛程度、术后并发症、胃肠功能恢复情况。结果:A、B两组的术后观察指标(包括住院天数、切口疼痛程度、术后并发症、胃肠功能恢复情况)比较差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对于不同手术方式的阑尾炎患者,护理人员应采取相应的护理措施,帮助患者尽快恢复健康,避免术后并发症的发生。 Objective:To study the different operative methods for appendicitis resection postoperative nursing methods for patients with different effect and the influence of recovery.Methods:The patients with appendicitis 62 cases in accordance with the principles of voluntary participation patients into two groups,group A had 28 patients,in laparoscopic downlink appendectomies;Group B had 34 patients,did traditional appendectomies.Postoperative observation indicators included:hospital days,incision pain intensity,the postoperative complications and recovery of gastrointestinal function.Results:A,B groups of postoperative observation indexed(including hospitalization days,incision pain intensity,the postoperative complications and recovery of gastrointestinal function)A statistically significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion:Different operative ways of appendicitis patients,nursing staff should adopt corresponding nursing measures and help patients to get fit as quickly as possible,avoid postoperative complications.
作者 龚莉
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2011年第20期173-174,共2页 China Medical Herald
关键词 常规开腹阑尾切除术 腹腔镜阑尾切除术 护理 Conventional sigmoidectomy appendectomies Laparoscopic appendectomy via Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献22

  • 1秦长江,孔天东,王伟.二孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术的探讨[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(2):170-171. 被引量:6
  • 2张传国,刘允,吕超.急性阑尾炎术后切口长期不愈的原因及防治[J].中国普通外科杂志,2005,14(11):878-879. 被引量:26
  • 3王建峰,景东,石正峰,席红卫,崔彦北,陈博渊.小儿急性阑尾炎手术前后sICAM-1、IL-8和TNFa的变化及其临床意义[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2006,27(1):23-25. 被引量:9
  • 4汪健.细胞因子在急性阑尾炎诊治中作用的研究进展[J].临床外科杂志,2006,14(5):321-322. 被引量:3
  • 5Makarov AI, Vorob'eva NA, Dobrodeeva LK, et al. Laboratory criteria of systemic inflammatory syndrome by surgical abdominal infections [J]. Khirurgiia (Mosk), 2009,(5) :40-45.
  • 6Simon P, Burkhardt U, Sack U, et al. Inflammatory response is no different in children randomized to laparoseopie or open appendectomy [J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2009,19 (1):S71-76.
  • 7Yildirim O, Solak C, Kocer B, et al. The role of serum inflammatory markers in acute appendicitis and their success in preventing negative laparotomy [J]. J Invest Surg,2006,19(6) :345-352.
  • 8Schwarz A, Bolke E, Peiper M, et al. Inflammatory peritoneal reaction after perforated appendicitis: continuous peritoneal lavage versus non lavage [J]. Eur J Med Res, 2007,12(5) :200-205.
  • 9Grosclj-Grenc M, Repse S, Vidmar D, et al. Clinical and laboratory methods in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children [J]. Croat Med J, 2007,48 (3):353-361.
  • 10Groselj Grenc M, Repsc S, Dolenc-Strazar Z, et al. Interleukin-6 and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in acute appendicitis in children[J]. Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 2007,67(2) :197-206.

共引文献165

同被引文献63

引证文献16

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部