员工社会网络结构特征对关系绩效影响的比较研究基于中外两个研发事业部员工整体社会网分析被引量：17

A Comparative Study of the Effects of Employees' Social Network Structural Characteristics on Their Contextual Performance: A Case Analysis Based on Two Research & Development Divisions of Chinese and Foreign Corporations

下载PDF

导出

摘要以两个集团公司研发事业部为个案,本文构建了不同情境下员工的社会网络,并对不同网络的关系特征值做了计算。研究发现,员工所处的社会网络位置对员工关系绩效存在显著影响;网络结构特征对国有企业员工和外资企业员工关系绩效的影响不同;中外企业研发员工社会网络的整体结构特征存在一定差异。这一发现为企业通过优化社会网络改善员工关系绩效提供了理论支持,同时丰富了嵌入性理论在中国企业的实践和应用。 The sample of this study included two Research ＆ Development divisions of Chinese and foreign corporations. Based on theories and literature review, the employees＇ social networks in different contexts were identified and the values of individuals＇ relational characteristics in their varying networks were calculated. The employees＇ network location was found to have a significant impact on their contextual performance. The network structural characteristics of the employees in the state corporation differed from those of the employees in the foreign corporation and also, in their effects on the employees＇ contextual performance. These findings may serve as theoretical support for bettering employees＇ contextual performance through improving their social networks and may also enrich the practice and application of the embeddedness theory in Chinese companies.

作者彭建平

机构地区中山大学管理学院

出处《社会》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期49-64,共16页 Chinese Journal of Sociology

基金教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目资助(10YJA630124)~~

关键词网络中心性关系绩效社会网络 network centrality, contextual performance, social network

分类号 C912.3 [经济管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献30

1Ahuja, Galletta M.K. and D.F. Carley. 2003. "Individual Centrality and Performance in Virtual R&D Groups.. An Empirical Study." Management Science (1) :21 - 38.
2Avis, J. M., J.D. Kudisch, and V. J. Fortunato. 2002. " Examining the Incremental Validity and Adverse Impact of Cognitive Ability and Conscientiousness on Job Performance. " Journal of Business and Psychology (171):87 - 105.
3Borman, W.C. and S.J. Molowidlo. 1993. "Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance." in Personnel Selection in Organizations, edited by N. Schmitt and W. C. Borman. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
4Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge.. Harvard University Press.
5蔡永红,林崇德,陈学锋.学生评价教师绩效的结构验证性因素分析[J].心理学报,2003,35(3):362-369. 被引量：32
6陈艳莹,周娟.经济学视角的社会网络研究述评[J].经济研究导刊,2009(8):18-21. 被引量：7
7Coleman, V. I. 1998. "Investigation of the Underlying Structure of the Contextual Performance Domain." The Science and Engineering (58) : 44 - 99.
8Conway, J.M. 1999. "Distinguishing Contextual Performance from Task Performance for Managerial Jobs." Journal of Applied Psychology (84) : 3 - 13.
9Cross, Rob and J. N. Cummings. 2004. "Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge Intensive Work." Academy of Management Journal (6) : 928- 937.
10Dyer,J. H. and H. Singh. 1998. "The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage." Academy of Mana9ement Review (4) :660 - 679.