期刊文献+

经皮气管切开与传统气管切开的对比研究 被引量:1

经皮气管切开与传统气管切开的对比研究
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经皮气管切开与传统气管切开各项指标的差异。方法:对50例气管切开的临床资料进行分析。结果:经皮气管切开手术时间、出血量、拔管后切口愈合情况及颈部瘢痕大小均优于传统气管切开。结论:经皮气管切开术操作简单、安全、快速、并发症少,术后瘢痕小,是快速建立人工气道的一项成熟技术,需行气管切开时应首选此法。 the purpose study Be cut open and cut open the difference of each index sign with traditional windpipe by skin windpipe. The method carries on analysis to the clinical data that fifty windpipes cut open. The result slices to heal after cutting open surgical operation time, bleed quantity and pull out a tube through the skin windpipe circumstance and neck sear formation size to all surpass traditional windpipe to cut open. The conclusion cuts open a Shu operation through the skin windpipe simple, safety, rapid, the complications is little, the sear formation is small, a mature tech- nique of rapid establishment artificial spirit way, choose this method in response to the head while needing to go windpipe to cut open after the Shu.
出处 《内蒙古中医药》 2011年第11期132-133,共2页 Inner Mongolia Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词 经皮气管切开 传统气管切开 对比 研究 cut open through the skin windpipe The traditional windpipe cuts open to compare to study
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献6

共引文献293

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部