摘要
目的 评价胃肠外科胃管采用负压引流方式与虹吸引流方式的临床效果.方法 抽取600例胃肠外科经胃管引流的患者,分为试验组和对照组,其中试验组307例,对照组293例.试验组采用虹吸方式引流,对照组采用负压方式引流,比较两组患者术后的总引流量,持续引流时间,引流管堵塞次数、并发症发生次数、相关治疗费用.结果 试验组总引流量、持续引流时间、并发症的发生次数均与对照组相比无统计学差异（P〉0.05）,但引流管堵塞次数明显少于对照组（P〈0.01）,相关治疗费用明显低于对照组（P〈0.01）.结论 应用于胃肠外科术后胃管采用虹吸引流方式的效果优于负压引流方式.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of siphonage drainage mode and negative pressure drainage mode.Methods Six hundred patients with gastric tube drainage were selected randomly and divided test group（307 cases） and control group（293 cases）. Siphonage drainage mode was adopted in test group, negative pressure drainage mode was adopted in control group. The total quantity of drainage, the total time of drainage, the clogging frequency and the postoperative complication frequency of drainage were compared between two groups after operation.Results There was no statistical difference of total quantity, total time, postoperative complication frequency of drainage between two groups（P〉0.05）.But There were statistical difference of the clogging frequency and the cost between test group and control group（P〈0.01）.Those of test group were superior to control group.Conclusions The siphonage drainage mode is better than the negative pressure drainage mode in gastrointestinal surgery.
出处
《国际护理学杂志》
2011年第7期1083-1084,共2页
international journal of nursing
关键词
虹吸引流
负压引流
胃肠减压
Siphonage drainage
Negative pressure drainage
Gastrointestinal decompression
