摘要
民国时期已出现"历史上之六大都会"、"中国五大名都"和中国"四都"等说法,从而开启了中国大古都认定之先河。1976年,中国"五大古都"的明确提出及"大古都"概念的使用,使大古都的认定从形成期转入繁盛期。20世纪80年代以来,相继提出和认定了中国"六大古都"和"七大古都",此外,"四大古都"、"三大古都"、"十大古都"也在这一时期先后出现。90年代,大古都标准的讨论反映出大古都的认定迈入了成熟期。2004年,"八大古都"得以确认。这些大古都之说的发展呈现出主流与并存的局面,并具有各自的学术脉络。到目前为止,"大古都"用语逐渐固定化,"大古都"标准日益受到重视,多种大古都学说关系密切。今后大古都的认定,应该重视古都等级的划分和"大古都"古都等级范围的选定,以科学的学术研究成果作为大古都认定的基础,处理好科学研究与社会发展的关系。
There are several statements during the period of the Republic of China, which started the era of the cognition about China＇s Historic Capitals. In 1976, China＇s Five Historic Capitals was put forward, so the new thriving age was coming. Since 1980s, China＇s Six Historic Capitals and China＇ s Seven Historic Capitals were put forward and confirmed. China＇s Four Historic Capitals, China＇s Three Historic Capitals and China＇s Ten Historic Capitals were raised one after another. The discussion on the standards of China＇s Historic Capitals is a sign of a mature period in 1990s. In 2004, China＇s Eight Historic Capitals was confirmed. These theories about China＇s Historic Capitals display academic sequence of ideas. So far, the term of Historic Capitals has been immobilized, the standards of them have been appreciated, and there are close connection among main these theories. From now on, we should pay attention to the division about Chinese ancient capital rank and the choice on rank range of China＇s Historic Capitals, take the academic achievement as the foundation of affirmation about China＇s Historic Capitals, and should correctly deal with the relations between academic research and social development.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第7期144-154,共11页
Academic Monthly
关键词
古都
大古都
五大古都
六大古都
七大古都
ancient capital, China＇ s Historic Capitals, China＇ s Five Historic Capitals, China＇ s Six Historic Capitals, China＇s Seven Historic Capitals
