期刊文献+

不当得利与财产性犯罪的区分认定——以实际疑难案例为分析样本

The Discrimination and Determination between Unjustified Enrichment and Property Crime——take a difficult case as the sample for analyzing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于社会现象的纷繁复杂,使得民事不法与刑事不法交错相生,难以正确地加以界分。在对一些疑难案例的分析认定过程中,往往会涉及多种侵犯财产利益的不法行为,不当得利与财产性犯罪的界限模糊不清。对不当得利与财产性犯罪的区分认定,应当在其一般理论的基础上,以行为对象为切入角度,进而依据权属关系的变动情况来认定行为人的主观方面和客观行为,最终确定该不法行为的性质。 Abstract: Since the complexity of social phenomenon, it is difficult to tell the difference between civil offense and Criminal offense. In the analysis and assessment on some difficult cases, we usually meet quite a few wrongful act of violation of property and the boundary between unjustified enrichment and property crime is not so determinate. While discriminating unjusti- fied enrichment from property crime, we should take the general theory about them as the basis and the object of wrongful act as the angle of analysis. Then we judge the subjective and objective behavior of the actors according to the transmutation of the ownership relation. At last, we can determine the nature of the wrongful act of violation of property.
作者 邱灵
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2011年第4期110-113,共4页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 不当得利 财产性犯罪 盗窃罪 侵占罪 区分认定 Unjustified Enrichment Property Crime larceny Embezzlement Discrimination and Determination
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献4

  • 1[日]山口厚.刑法各论[M].东京:有斐阁,2005.192.
  • 2李至鑫.在车上捡拾他人熟睡时掉落的手机如何定性[N].检察日报,2005-12-9.
  • 3[日]大谷实.刑法讲义各论[M].东京:成文堂,2007.286.
  • 4李义欣,沈兆堂.拾得取包牌在超市冒领皮包该定何罪[N].检察日报,2006-7-21.

共引文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部