期刊文献+

基于领域规则的军用仿真模型组合建模 被引量:2

Domain Rule-based Composite Modeling Approach for Military Simulation Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 分析了仿真模型的句法和语义组合方法,针对当前的组合方法在表达领域知识对组合建模约束存在的问题,提出了基于领域规则的仿真模型组合建模方法。采用符合HLA标准的基本对象模型表示原子模型和层次组合模型。通过逻辑规则表示组合建模的接口匹配规则和组合模型的领域知识,并根据领域知识建立组合建模的领域规则。用通用逻辑推理引擎实现领域规则对组合建模的约束检验和接口匹配检查。通过某电子对抗仿真系统的应用,结果表明,该方法和BOM结合是一种有效的组合建模方法,能有效的表示领域知识对组合模型的约束。 Syntactic and semantic composite modeling approaches were analyzed.For the problem of current composite modeling approaches to represent domain knowledge constrain to composite modeling,a composite modeling approach for equipment simulation models based on domain rules was proposed.Basic Object Model(BOM) was implied to represent atomic model and hierarchical composite model,which was compliant with High Level Architecture(HLA) standard.Logical rules were implied to represent interface matching rules of composite modeling and domain knowledge of composite model.Domain rules for composite modeling were set up.The verification of interface matching and domain rule constrain to composite modeling was implement by general logical reasoning engine.With the test of an electrical countermine simulation,result reveals that it is an effective composite modeling approach for military simulation model and constrain of domain knowledge on composite model can be represented by the approach.
出处 《系统仿真学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第8期1527-1532,共6页 Journal of System Simulation
基金 国家自然科学基金(61074108 91024030/G03)
关键词 组合建模 领域规则 逻辑推理 基本对象模型 模型体系 接口匹配 composite modeling domain rules logical reasoning model architecture basic object model interface matching
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Parsons D, Surdu L J, Jordan B. OneSAF: A Next Generation Simulation Modeling the Contemporary Operating Environment [C]// Euro-Simulation Interoperability Workshop. Toulouse, France. USA: IEEE Press, 2005: 05E-SIW-19.
  • 2Ternion Corporation. FLAMES [EB/OL]. (2008-3) [2010-9-11]. http ://www. ternion, com/.
  • 3Petty M D, Weasel E W. A Format Basis for a Theory of Semantic Composability [C]// SISO Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Florida, USA. USA: IEEE Press, 2003: 03S-SIW-056.
  • 4Petty M D, Weisel E W, Mielke R R. Computational Complexity of Selecting Components for Composition [C]// Proceedings of the 37th Winter Simulation Conference, Florida, USA. USA: IEEE Press, 2003: 2472-2481.
  • 5Weisel E W. Validity of Models and Classes of Models in Semantic Composability [C]// SISO Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Florida, USA. USA: IEEE Press, 2003: 03S-SIW-076.
  • 6Mathiasrohl Uhrmacher A. definition and analysis of composition structures for discrete:event models [C]// Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Winter Simulation, Washington, USA. USA: IEEE Press, 2008: 942-950.
  • 7Yilmaz L. On the Need for Contextualized Introspective Models to Improve Reuse and Composability of Defense Simulations [J]. Journal of Defense Model and Simulation (S1548-5129), 2004, 1(3): 141-151.
  • 8Szabo C, Teo Y M. On Syntactic Composability and Model Reuse [C]//First Asia International Conference on Modeling & Simulation, Phuket, Thailand. USA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2007: 230-237.
  • 9Szabo C, Teo Y M. An Approach for Validation of Semantic Composability in Simulation Models [C]// Proceedings of the 2009 ACM/IEEE/SCS 23rd Workshop on Principles of Advanced and Distributed Simulation, New York, USA. USA: IEEE Press, 2009: 3-10.
  • 10Davis P K, Anderson R H. Improving the Composability of DoD Models and Simulations [J]. Journal of Defense Model and Simulation (S 1548-5129), 2004, 1 (1): 5-17.

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部