摘要
目的:总结在DSA检查时造影剂应用方面的体会和经验。材料和方法:共行DSA 2560人次,其中男性1850例,女性710例,年龄5个月到85岁,包括动脉和静脉造影。其中用离子型造影剂2100人次,非离子型造影剂460人次。结果:造影剂注射次数1—12次不等,平均4次,造影剂用量10—180ml,平均58ml。DSA质量评价:优等为85％,中等为13％,差为2％。副反应:离子型造影剂组和非离子造影剂组分别为4.8％和1.4％。无一例死亡。结论:对不同部位进行造影时应选择合适的造影剂,既考虑安全又考虑到病人的经济情况,选择适当的流速流量,既显示血管及其病变,又减少过敏反应及不适感的发生。
Objective: To summarize the experience of application of contrast media in DSA. Materials and Methods: DSA had been done in 2560 patients with arteriography and venography, among them male 1850, famale 710, age from 5 month to 85 years old, ionic-contrast media was used in 2100 cases but nonionic contrast media in 460. Results: Contrast: media was injected from 1 to 12 times, average 4 times, and the volume of contrast media was from 10 to 180ml, average 58ml. The quality of DSA was; 85% of high-class, 13% secondary and 2% bad. Side effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media was 4.8% and 1. 4%, respectively. Nobody died. Conclusion: Suitable contrast media should be selected according to different organ when angiography were done, considering the safety and financial condition of the patients. Suitable injection velocity and volume should be selected to show the vascular and the lesion, and to reduce allergic reactions.
出处
《影像诊断与介入放射学》
1999年第4期220-221,共2页
Diagnostic Imaging & Interventional Radiology
