摘要
目的：比较经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术和经尿道前列腺等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效。方法：将60例良性前列腺增生的患者随机分为两组：分别行经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术30例，和经尿道前列腺等离子电切术30例，对两组手术治疗的效果进行评价和比较。结果；TUEP组术中各项指标均较PKRP组好，两组比较差异有显著意义（P〈0．05）。结论：PKEP治疗前列腺增生具更好的有效性和安全性，值得临床推广使用。
Objective To compare the curative effect of TUEP and PKRP on benign prostatic hyperplasia. Method 60 cases of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were divided into two groups： In TUEP group, 30 patients were treated by TUEP; in PKRP group, 30 patients were treated by PKRP. The effect of the two groups were evaluated and compared. Results All the indicatrixs in TUEP group Were better than the PKRP group （P〈0. 05）. Conclusion Comparing to PKRP, the treatment of TUEP, has a better effectivity and security and is worth for generalization.
