期刊文献+

ICU与非ICU血培养细菌分布及耐药性对比分析 被引量:3

Comparative analysis of distribution and drug resistance of hemoculture between ICU and non-ICU
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对比重症监护病房(ICU)与非ICU的血培养结果,分析两个病区的细菌耐药情况。方法:采用梅里埃的VITEK-2微生物分析系统对血标本中分离的病原菌进行鉴定和药敏试验。结果:ICU血培养分离常见菌依次为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS),鲍曼不动杆菌,肺炎克雷伯菌,大肠杆菌,铜绿假单胞菌,金黄色葡萄球菌。非ICU的常见菌为大肠杆菌,肺炎克雷伯菌,CNS,铜绿假单胞菌,金黄色葡萄球菌,鲍曼不动杆菌。总体来说,在ICU血液培养出的鲍曼不动杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的耐药率要高于非ICU。结论:ICU的血液分离菌多呈多重耐药,尤其是鲍曼不动杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌,应特别注意合理选用抗生素。 Objective:To compare and analyze the drug resistance of bacteria from blood culture in ICU and non-ICU.Methods: The identification and antibiotic sensitivity test of isolated bacteria were performed by VITEK-2 system.Results: The most frequent isolated bacteria from blood culture in ICU is Coagulase negative Staphylococcus,Acinetobater baumannii,Klebsiella spp,Escherichia coli,Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Staphylococcus aurens.In non-ICU,the result is Escherichia coli,Klebsiella spp,CNS,Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Staphylococcus aurens,Acinetobater baumannii.The drug resistance of Acinetobater baumannii and Klebsiella spp from ICU is higher than that from non-ICU.Conclusion: The isolated bacteria from ICU blood culture was multiple drug resistance,especially the Acinetobater baumannii and Klebsiella spp,so it is very important to pay special attention when using antibiotics.
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 CAS 2011年第7期1750-1752,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词 血培养 ICU 耐药 Blood culture Intensive care unit Drug resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

  • 1沈春丽.医护人员洗手情况调查[J].护理研究,2004,18(10):1718-1719. 被引量:51
  • 2毛文祥,毛海斌,刘玲珑.医院感染病原菌分布及耐药性变迁分析[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2007,17(1):39-42. 被引量:11
  • 3Richards MJ ,Edwards JR,Culver DH,Gaynes RP. Nosocomial infection in medical intensive care units in the United States: Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System[J]. Crit Care Med, 1999,27 : 887-892.
  • 4Byers KE,Adal KA,Anglim AM,Farr BM. Case fatality rate for catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRSBI):a meta-analysis[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 1995,16 : 23.
  • 5Gillies D, O'Riordan L,Wallen M, et al. Timing of intravenous administration set changes: a systematic review[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2004,25 (3) : 240-250.
  • 6Rickard CM, Lipman J, Courtney MR, et al. routine changing of intravenous administration sets does not reduce colonization or infection in central venous catheters[J].Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2004,25 (8) : 650-655.
  • 7Souweine B, Traore O, Aiahlet-Cuveilier B, et al, Dialysas and central venous catheter infections in critically ill patients: results of a prospective study[J]. Crit Care Med, 1999, 27: 2394-2398.
  • 8Karchmer AW. Nosocomial bloodstream infections: organisms, risk factors, and implications[ J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2000, (Suppl 4) :S139 - 143.
  • 9Edmond MB, Wallace SE, McClish DK, et al. Nosecomial bloodstream infections in United States hospitals: a 3 - year analysis [ J ]. Clin Infect Dis, 1999,29(4) :239 -244.
  • 10Denton M, Kerr KG. Microbiological and elinicat aspects of infection associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia[ J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 1998,11(11) : 57 -80.

共引文献68

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部