摘要
科学在形而上之善或纯粹善或目的善的意义上,是善;在形而下之善或实践善或手段善的意义上,需要针对具体问题具体分析。作为知识体系的科学或科学知识基本上是价值中性的,至于作为研究活动的科学和作为社会建制的科学则包含多一些的价值,它必须在社会的法律框架和人类的道德规范之内运行,否则就会有意或无意地做出非善之举来。当然,以此为理由为科学设置禁区,不仅于事无补,而且会损害人类的长远利益。不过,作为科学主体的科学家,应该对自己的社会责任和道德责任有清醒的认识,按照科学伦理的规范行事,始终把人类的福祉放在第一位。这样一来,科学也就会在总体上是善了。
Based on an exhaustive and elaborate list of diverse debates on whether science is good, evil or neutral, this paper proposes its own opinion on the issue, which is, in sense of metaphysical, pure or objective good, science is good; however, in sense of physical, practical or instrumental good, it needs to be analyzed particularly under specific circumstances. According to the author, it is none other than men who can finally decide things for being good or evil, while in terms of science, it is decided by the men who trot it into aPPlication.
出处
《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2011年第3期19-31,共13页
Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词
科学
科学知识
善
恶
中性
science
scientific knowledge
good
evil
neutral
