摘要
对于转售价格维持行为,传统反垄断法上强调其便利零售卡特尔以及生产商卡特尔等负面效果,因而长期适用本身违法规则。2007年美国最高法院的Leegin案判决则改而采用合理规则,这对我国《反垄断法》第14条、第15条的实施具有重大的启发意义。但另一方面,合理规则的适用十分复杂,因而应当在进行合理性分析之前,先对相关市场的情况进行考察,以明确该行为是否符合产生反竞争效果的结构条件,对于不满足这些条件的行为,则认定其合法,而不需要进行进一步的合理性分析。这样可以大大减少需要进行深入分析的案件的范围,简化合理规则的适用,并为经营者提供明确的指引。
Traditional antimonopoly law,which focused on the negative effects of maintenance of resale price such as the facilitation of dealer cartel or manufacturer cartel,applied to this kind of restraint.In 2007,the Supreme Court of the United States overruled this rule by its judgement in Leegin case and began to apply rule of reason,which is very complex and difficult to handle in individual cases,and it is important for the 14th and 15th articles of Anti-monopoly Law to carry out.Therefore some ways have to be found to simplify relevant analysis of this rule.The most important way is to analysize the constructure of the relevant market in order to find if the structural prerequisites for the anti-competition effects have existed and exclude most of maintenance of resale price cases from the analysis of reason so as to give clear guidance to enterprises as well as courts and antimonopoly authorities.
出处
《政法论丛》
2011年第4期98-103,共6页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
转售价格维持
纵向价格限制
反垄断法
maintenance of resale price
vertical price restraints
Anti-monopoly Law