摘要
许慎在《说文解字》当中首创的汉字部首说是我国文字学研究的一个伟大创造,但他的部首说及其归部原则并不是无懈可击的真理,比如,《说文解字.八部》就是一个值得商榷的典型。我们充分利用目前所能见到的甲骨文、金文、战国文字等文字形体重新审视了《说文解字.八部》诸字,发现许慎的八部归部存在一些不可忽视的偏差,即《说文解字.八部》内的"詹"、"介"、"■"、"公"、"必"、"余"等字本义与八字本义区别较大,入八部不妥。
The theory of radicals in Shuowenjiezi initiated by Xushen is a great creation. However, his theory and the classification of radicals are not reasoned and unassailable truths. The radicals of Ba （八） in Shuowenjiezi is only a typical example which needs to be discussed. We have re--examined all the ancient Chinese characters in radicals of Ba （八） in Shuowenjiezi through inspecting all the ancient Chinese character＇s forms in the Oracle Bone Inscriptions, the Inscriptions on Ancient Bronze Objects, and the characters of Warring States. We have found that there are some mistakes in the radicals of Ba（八） in Shuowenjiezi. Specifically speaking, some characters ,such as zhan（八） ,jie（介）, O ,gong（公） ,bi（必） ,yu（余）, and so on, in the radicals of Ba （八） in Shuowenjiezi could not be classified into the radicals of Ba（八） as the relations between their original meanings and character Ba＇s（八） are not so closely related.
出处
《中南林业科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2011年第4期104-107,共4页
Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology（Social Sciences）
关键词
许慎
说文解字
八部
甲骨文
金文
Xushen ； Shuowenjiezi ； radicals Ba （八）； the Oracle Bone Inscriptions； the Inscriptions on Ancient Bronze Objects
