期刊文献+

基于马尔可夫方法的飞控系统安全性评估 被引量:3

Safety Assessment Research of Flight Control System Based on MA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 安全性评估是适航符合性验证的重要方法。对马尔可夫分析在系统安全性评估中的应用进行了深入研究,给出了马尔可夫在系统安全性评估中的一般分析方法。运用马尔可夫方法和故障树方法分别对飞行控制系统的同一种失效状态进行了建模分析,并对二者的分析结果进行了比较,得出对并联顺序系统进行安全性分析时马尔可夫分析方法具有更高的定量分析精度,并克服了故障树静态分析特性的缺点。 Safety analysis is an important method of compliance demonstration for airworthiness regulation. The application of Markov analysis in system safety assessment is studied, and the common method of Markov analysis for system safety assessment is given. A failure state of flight control system is modeled and analyzed by Markov analysis and fault tree analysis respectively, and the results of the two methods are compared. It shows that Markov method has higher accuracy of quantitative analysis when the safety analysis of the sequence parallel system is analyzed. This method also overcomes the shortcomings of the static analysis features of the fault tree analysis.
出处 《中国民航大学学报》 CAS 2011年第4期16-19,共4页 Journal of Civil Aviation University of China
基金 民航局科技项目(MHRD200918)
关键词 安全性评估 飞控系统 故障树 马尔可夫 safety assessment flight control system fault tree analysis Markov analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Advisory Circular 25.1309 - 1A : System design and analysis [G].
  • 2SAE.SAE ARP4761 Guideline and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and E-quipment[S]. SAE,1996.
  • 3周经轮,龚时雨,颜兆林.系统安全性分析[M].湖南:中南大学出版社,2003.
  • 4陆中,孙有朝.马尔可夫分析在系统安全性评估中的应用研究[J].中国民航大学学报,2008,26(5):43-45. 被引量:4
  • 5KUMAR RAJENDRA, JACKSON ALAZEL. Accurate Reliability Modeling Using Markov Analysis with Non-constant Hazard Rates[C]//2009 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2009.
  • 6GOBLE W, CHEDDIE H. Control System Safety Evaluation and reliability[M]. US: ISA, 1998.
  • 7ANDREW DESIGN J, ERICSON II C. Fault Tree and Markov Analysis Applied to Various Complexities [C]//In: Proceedings of the 18th international systems safety conference. 2000.

二级参考文献2

  • 1[1]Advisory Circular 25.1309-1A:System design and analysis[G].
  • 2[2]SAE.SAE ARP4761 Guideline and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipment[S].SAE,1996.

共引文献4

同被引文献17

  • 1张绍杰,陶峰,黄一敏.运输类飞机EWIS安全性评估实施研究[J].航空标准化与质量,2012(4):21-24. 被引量:4
  • 2AC33. 75 - 1A. GUIDANCE MATERIAL FOR 14CFR 33.75. SAFETY ANALYSIS [ G]. 2007. 9.
  • 3SAE ARP4761. The Society of Automotive Engineering. Aerospace Recommended Practice: Guideline and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Sys- tems and Equipment[S]. U.S. , 1996, 12.
  • 4Y. Ren, J. B. Dugan. , Design of Reliable Systems Using Static & Dynamic Fault Tree [ J ]. IEEE Trans on Reliability, 1998, 47 (3) : 234- 244.
  • 5Maniau R, Coppit D W, Sullivan K J, et al. Bridging the gap between systems and dynamic fault tree models[C]//Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. Washington: IEEE, 1999, 105-111.
  • 6Long W, Sato Y, Horigome M. Quantifieation of sequential failure logie of fault tree analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2000, 67: 269-274.
  • 7Zhang X Y, Sun H R. A BDD based algorithm for reliability analysis of phased mission systems[J]. IEEE Trans on Reliability, 1999, 46 (1): 50- 60.
  • 8朱正福,李长福,何恩山,杨春华.基于马尔可夫链的动态故障树分析方法[J].兵工学报,2008,29(9):1104-1107. 被引量:40
  • 9张晓洁,赵海涛,苗强,张伟,黄洪钟.基于动态故障树的卫星系统可靠性分析[J].宇航学报,2009,30(3):1249-1254. 被引量:46
  • 10王新阁,张显余,张艳敬,李晓宇,齐健.某型运输机飞控计算机动态故障树分析[J].飞机设计,2011,31(4):69-73. 被引量:2

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部