摘要
采用FAST面料风格仪中压烫性测试装置和YG541B型面料折皱弹性仪分别测试10块仿毛面料的压烫角和折皱回复角,分别通过图像法与手工读数法获得面料压烫角及回复角数据,并对测试数据平均值、标准差指标作相关性分析。结果表明:图像法测得面料的压烫角和折皱弹性回复角较传统手工读数法所得结果的标准差小,数据更稳定;压烫角和折皱回复角数据具有较高的负相关性,面料折皱回复角数据无法代替压烫性进行面料风格评价。
The pressed-iron and crease recovery performances of ten pieces of wool-like fabrics were tested by press tester of FAST fabric style instrument and YG541B fabric wrinkle elasticity tester respectively,and the recovery angles were got by image method and manual readings method respectively.It analysed the data of means and standard deviations.The conclusions as following： the standard deviations of mage measured data for FAST fabric style instrument and YG541B fabric crease angle were less than the mannual readings method,and the image method was accuracy.The pressed-iron angles and crease recovery angles data had a high negative correlation,and YG541B fabric wrinkle elasticity tester can not replace FAST fabric style instrument for evaluation of fabric style.
出处
《毛纺科技》
CAS
北大核心
2011年第9期42-46,共5页
Wool Textile Journal
基金
浙江省分析测试科技计划项目(项目编号:2009F70022)
浙江省大学生科技创新项目(2009年新苗人才计划)
关键词
仿毛面料
压烫
折皱
回复角
面料风格
wool-like fabrics
pressed-iron
crease
recovery angle
fabric style
