摘要
光绪帝死因问题是学界百年公案,2008年科技检测证明光绪帝系砒霜中毒死亡。科技手段的介入推动了史学研究的进步,并得到广泛认同。随着学界认识的趋同,其研究重点迅速由"是否被害"转而为"凶手是谁"。而数十年来借助文献档案研究的主流观点是光绪帝死于疾病,这与科技检测之间形成鲜明的对立。尽管学界也有文章利用文献档案等历史文字资料进行研究得出光绪死于谋杀的结论,只是这一结论未能占据主流,难以被广泛认同。文献档案资料的最大不足在于内涵的多歧性,这就要求史学工作者要付出更多的艰辛,去伪存真。文献档案与科技手段相结合昭示着史学的光明未来,史学研究方法多样化是未来史学的必由之路。
The cause of death of Emperor Guangxu（1875--1908） is a hundred-year case. In 2008, the test Findings showed that Emperor Guangxu died of arsenic poisoning. The involvement of Science and technology promote the progress of historical studies, and it is widely recognized. With the convergence of academic knowledge, the fbcus of research shifts quickly from ＂whether he is the victim＂ to ＂Who is the murderer.＂ The past decade research through literature has come to the shared view that Emperor Guangxu died of disease, which forms a striking contrast with the test findings t^rough technology. Though some scholars put forward the similar sentiments, yet theirs are not testified and then accepted widely. The biggest deficiency in the literature archives is that there exist multiple interpretations of the same literature, which requires historians make more efforts to work hard, eliminating the false and retaining tbe trae. Therefore, the combination of documents and archives with technology means means a brighter future for history study, which means that the melhod for historical study should be diverse.
出处
《遵义师范学院学报》
2011年第4期1-7,共7页
Journal of Zunyi Normal University
关键词
光绪帝
死因
慈禧太后
Emperor Guangxu
cause of death
Empress Dowager Cixi
