摘要
目的:研究根管治疗过程中3种暂封材料的临床封闭效果。方法:选取300颗患牙,其中单面洞150颗,复面洞150颗,随机分别采用Ceivtron暂封膏、氧化锌丁香油水门汀和牙胶条封闭1周后观察其封闭性能。选取450颗患牙(全部为单面洞),分成9组,分别采用Ceivtron暂封膏、氧化锌丁香油水门汀和牙胶条封闭3 d,1周,2周后观察其封闭性能。结果:Ceivtron暂封膏组和氧化锌丁香油水门汀组封闭性能相当,均优于牙胶条组。但氧化锌丁香油水门汀的特殊气味不易被患者接受。结论:Ceivtron暂封材料是临床综合效果较好的暂封材料。
Objective： To compare the clinical effects of three kinds of temporary stopping in root canal therapy.Method： Three hundred sick teeth,including 150 with simple cavity and 150 with compound cavity,were randomly selected and sealed with Ceivtron,oxide-eugenol cement and gutta-percha.The seal effects were observed and recorded one week later.Forty hundred and fifty sick teeth（entirely simple cavity） were divided into 9 groups randomly and sealed with the above-mentioned three kinds of materials.Sealing effects were observed and recorded respectively at 3 days,one week and two weeks after operation.Result： Ceivtron and oxide-eugenol cement showed better sealing effect than gutta-percha.But the oxide-eugenol cement is not popular among patients because of its bad smell.Conclusion： The results suggested that Ceivtron may be the best choice among the three kinds of materials in root canal therapy.
出处
《大理学院学报（综合版）》
CAS
2011年第8期65-67,共3页
Journal of Dali University
