期刊文献+

无痛内镜下黏膜切除术治疗结肠无蒂息肉52例疗效观察 被引量:4

a Research on the efficacy of treating 52 cases of colon sessile polyps with mucosal resection by painless endoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨无痛内镜下黏膜切除术治疗结肠无蒂息肉的临床效果及并发症进行探讨。方法对52例结肠无蒂息肉在芬太尼、丙泊酚静脉麻醉下行内镜下黏膜切除术,对切除标本进行病理组织学观察,术后定期内镜随访一年,以评价切除效果,记录术中术后发生并发症及处理情况。结果 52例患者81颗息肉均一次性切除成功率100%,1年后复查2例复发。总有效率为96.15%,复发率为3.85%,出血1例给予氩气凝固术(APC)治疗及药物喷洒治疗成功止血,未发现穿孔及其他并发症。结论无痛内镜下黏膜切除术是一种安全微创的治疗手段,具有成功率高,操作简单、安全、无痛苦,损伤小等特点,值得临床推广和应用。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and the complication of treating colon sessile polyps with mueosal resection by painless endoscopy. Methods Given 52 cases of colon sessile polyps endoscopic mucosal resection with the Fentanyl, Propofol anesthesia. Treated the resection specimens with histopathological observation and examined them with endoscopy regularly during following year after surgery. Recorded intraoperative and postoperative complications and the treatments. Evaluated the efficacy of resection. Results 81 colon sessile polyps of the 52 patients were reseeted once and for all with a success rate of 100%. Two recurrences were examined in a year. The total effective rate was 96. 15% , the recurrence rate was 3.85%. Treat the only hemorrhage case with argon coagulation (APC) drug therapy and stop bleeding successfully. No perforation and other complications were examined. Conclusion Painless endoscopic mueosal resection is a safe and minimally invasive treatment characterized with high success rates, simplicity, safety, painlessness, less damage etc. This method is worthy of clinical application widely.
作者 赵瑞斌 缪林
出处 《中国实用医药》 2011年第24期20-21,共2页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 无痛 内镜下黏膜切除术 结肠息肉 Painless endoscopy Endoseopic mueosal resection Colon polyps
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献46

  • 1苏凯华,冯伟勋,刘坤平,梁凤玲,张小娟,简莉琴.巨大肠息肉83例的临床病理特征及内镜治疗分析[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(13):1545-1546. 被引量:8
  • 2周平红,徐美东,陈巍峰,钟芸诗,张轶群,王萍,王红美,姚礼庆,秦新裕.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直肠病变[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2007,24(1):4-7. 被引量:102
  • 3姚礼庆,周平红.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠病变[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2007,10(4):316-318. 被引量:48
  • 4Kikuchi R, Takano M, Takagi K, et al. Management of early invasive colorectal cancer. Risk of recurrence and clinical guidelines. Dis Colon Rectum, 1995, 38: 1286-1295.
  • 5Rembacken BJ. Endoscopic therapy of lower gastrointestinal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroentero1,2005,19:979-992.
  • 6Kato H, Haga S, Endo S, et al. Lifting of lesions during endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of early colorectal cancer: implications for the assessment of respectability. Endoscopy, 2001, 33: 568-573.
  • 7Ishiguro A, Uno Y, lshiguro Y, et al. Correlation of lifting versus non-lifting and microscopic depth of invasion in early colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc, 1999, 50: 329-333.
  • 8Okamoto H, Sasaki T, Tsubomizu Y, et al. Piecemeal polypectomy of large essile colonic polyps. Gastroenterol Endosc, 1988, 30: 1517-1522.
  • 9Gotoda T, Kondo H, Ono H, et al. A new endoscopic mucosal resection procedure using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife for rectal flat lesions: report of two cases. Gastrointest Endosc, 1999,50:560-563.
  • 10Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, et al. Management of bleeding concerning endoscopic submucosal dissection with the flex knife for stomach neoplasm. Dig Endosc, 2006, 18 ( Suppl 1 ) : S119-S122.

共引文献120

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部