期刊文献+

基于MATLAB的机载超短波通信系统效能模糊评估 被引量:1

Effectiveness Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation of Airborne UHF Communication System Based on MATLAB
原文传递
导出
摘要 分析评估具有多个因素的某机载超短波通信系统的效能。构建待评估系统的效能指标体系,运用结合层次分析思想的模糊综合评判模型,通过工程经验和专家评定构造判决矩阵,选用适当的模糊算子及基于MATLAB算法编程实现,对系统效能进行综合评估,评估结果表明该机载超短波通信系统效能达到良好水平。应用建立的模糊综合MATLAB算法,分析比较了不同权重指标因子对系统效能的影响。 The paper analyzes the effectiveness of an airborne UHF communication system which has multiple complicated factors.In order to analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the given system,the paper builds up a effectiveness index system,uses fuzzy synthetic evaluation model combined with the analytical hierarchy process(AHP),constructs judicative matrix which is structured based on the project experience and expert’s judgment,chooses and uses some suitable fuzzy arithmetic operators which realized based on MATLAB to comprehensively analyze the effectiveness of the given system.The evaluation results show that the effectiveness of the airborne UHF communication system achieves good level.Finally the paper discuss the impact of different weighting factors on system’s effectiveness by using established fuzzy synthetic algorithm.
作者 杨琨 刘国政
出处 《电子技术(上海)》 2011年第9期77-79,71,共4页 Electronic Technology
关键词 模糊综合评判 超短波通信 效能分析 层次分析法 模糊算子 MATLAB fuzzy synthetic evaluation UHF communication efficiency estimation AHP fuzzy arithmetic operator MATLAB
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Buckley J J. Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1985,15 (1): 21-31.
  • 2Bard J F, Sousk S E A tradeoff analysis for rough cargo handlers using the AHP: an example of group decision making[C]//Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, 2005:2042-2051.
  • 3GJB1128A-2002,机载超短波电台通用规范[S].2002.
  • 4GJB1145-91,军用通信设备定型试验和鉴定试验规程[S].1991.
  • 5朱建军,刘士新,王梦光.一种灵敏度和一致性相结合的决策区域分析[J].控制理论与应用,2004,21(4):537-540. 被引量:4
  • 6邵秋峰 ,马亚龙 ,胡锦川 .模糊合成算子在作战方案综合评估的应用研究[J].装甲兵工程学院学报,2004,18(4):41-43. 被引量:13
  • 7GJB5392-2005,机载通信对抗侦察设备试验场试验方法[S].2005.

二级参考文献12

  • 1许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1986.65-70.
  • 2LIPOVESTSKY S.Interval estimation of priorities in the AHP[J].European J of Operational Research,1999,114(1):153-164.
  • 3OBATA T,SHIRAISHI S.Assessment for an incomplete comparison matrix and improvement of an inconsistent comparison: computational experiments[C]∥Proc of the Fifth Int Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.[s.l.]:[s.n.],1999.http://www3.toyama-u.ac.jp/~shira/isahp.pdf,1999.
  • 4SAATY T L.Decision making with the AHP:why is the principal eigenvector necessary[J].European J of Operational Research,2003,145(1):85-91.
  • 5XU Z.On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgment matrix in AHP[J].European J of Operational Research,2000,126(3):683-687.
  • 6LIPOVESTSKY S,CONKLIN W M.Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP[J].European J of Operational Research,2002,137(1):110-122.
  • 7XU Z,WEI C P.A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process[J].European J of Operational Research,1999,116(2): 443-449.
  • 8Saaty T L.The seven pillars of the analytic hierarchy process[C]∥Proc of the Fifth Int Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.[s.l.]:[s.n.],1999.http://www.isahp2003.net/menus/about-ahp/Japan-ta.pdf,1999.
  • 9HURLEY W J.The analytic hierarchy process: a note on an approach to sensitivity which preserves rank order[J].Computers & Operations Research,2001,28(2):185-188.
  • 10FARKAS A.Data perturbations of matrices of pair wise comparisons[J].Annals of Operations Research,2001,101(1):401-425.

共引文献14

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部