期刊文献+

不同释放速度瘤胃调控剂对瘤胃亚急性酸中毒体外发酵参数的影响 被引量:1

Effect of Different Release Rate of Rumen Modulators on Fermentation Characteristics in vitro Induced by SARA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本试验通过在体外构建瘤胃亚急性酸中毒(SARA)模型,来研究不同释放速度的瘤胃调控剂对SARA体外发酵特性及牛链球菌数量的影响。选取3头育肥期并安装永久性瘤胃瘘管的宣汉黄牛,于晨饲2 h后采集瘤胃内容物,滤液作为体外发酵液的接种物,通过添加玉米与白酒糟(1∶1)的方式诱导体外发生SARA。借助于构建成功的SARA体外模型,设置4个试验处理:对照组、6 h完全释放组、8 h完全释放组和10 h完全释放组。在诱导SARA之后的0、2、4、6、8、10、12 h取样测定瘤胃各发酵指标及牛链球菌的相对数量。结果表明,与对照顾组相比,各试验组瘤胃液pH均极显著升高(P<0.01),乙酸、丙酸、丁酸、乳酸和总挥发性脂肪酸(total vol-atile fatty acids,TVFA)浓度也显著降低(P<0.05)。结果显示,8 h完全释放组不仅有效提高了瘤胃液pH,缓解了SARA状态,还对稳定瘤胃液环境和促进微生物的生长有显著效果。 The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different release rate of rumen modulators on fermentation characteristics and S.bovis number in vitro by the means of induced by subacute rumen acidosis(SARA) model.Three Xuanhan steers fitted with permanent ruminal cannulas were used and SARA was induced by adding corn and fresh distilled grain(1∶ 1).Then this experiment was divided into 4 groups: 6 h release group,8 h release group,10 h release group and the control group.The samples were taken at 0,2,4,6,8,10 and 12 h after the SARA model was induced and the rumen fermentation parameters were determined and S.bovis number was quantitated using 16S rRNA oligocecleotoide probe hybridization.The results showed that pH in all trial groups were significantly increased compared with that in the control group(P0.01),and ruminal acetate,propionate,butyrate and TVFA concentrations were significantly decreased(P0.05),while ruminal lactate content decreased significantly(P0.05).The results indicate 8 h release group can effectively reduce pH,promote the growth of microorganisms and improve the rumen fermentation.
出处 《动物营养学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期1608-1614,共7页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANIMAL NUTRITION
基金 现代农业(肉牛)产业技术体系专项经费资助(CARS-38)
关键词 瘤胃调控剂 释放速度 瘤胃亚急性酸中毒 发酵参数 rumen modulator release rate SARA fermentation characteristics
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1BEVANS D W, BEAUCHEMIN K A, SCHWARTZKOPF-GENSWEIN K S, et al. Effect of rapid or gradual grain adaptation on subacute acidosis and feed intake by feedlot cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2005, 83:1116-1132.
  • 2EMMANUEL D G V, DUNN S M, AMETAJ B N. Feeding high proportions of barley grain stimulates an inflammatory response in dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008, 91:606-614.
  • 3KHAFIPOUR E, KRAUSE D O, PLAIZIER J C. A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009,92:1060-1070.
  • 4PATON L, BEAUCHEMIN K, VIERA D, et al. Use of sodium bicarbonate, offered free choice or blended into the ration, to reduce the risk of ruminal acidosis in cattle[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2006, 86:429-437.
  • 5MENKE K H, STEINGASS H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid[J]. Animal Research and Development, 1988, 28:7-55.
  • 6赵新慧,刘陶世,段金廒.羟丙基甲基纤维素对左金胃漂浮缓释片的漂浮性能和药物释放特征的影响[J].中成药,2007,29(7):988-992. 被引量:10
  • 7胡伟莲,王佳堃,吕建敏,郭嫣秋,刘建新.瘤胃体外发酵产物中的甲烷和有机酸含量的快速测定[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2006,32(2):217-221. 被引量:37
  • 8张元庆,肖训军,孟庆翔.毛茛科植物提取物添加量对瘤胃微生物体外动态发酵的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2007,43(5):27-31. 被引量:7
  • 9EHSAN K, LI S C, JAN C P, et al. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis[J]. Applied Environment Microbiology,2009,75(22):7115-7124.
  • 10COOPER R, KLOPFENSTEIN T, STOCK R, et al. Effect of rumensin and feed intake variation on ruminal pH[R].Universrty of Nebraska:Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports,1997.

二级参考文献42

  • 1陈玉芬,杨军,高小晋.气相色谱法测定稻田甲烷排放通量[J].环境科学研究,1996,9(4):21-24. 被引量:1
  • 2[1]Cassida, et al. [J].J Anim Sci, 1986,69:1282-1292.
  • 3[2]Erdman, et al. [J].J Anim Sci, 1988,71:3246-3266.
  • 4[3]Allen, et al. [J].Feedstuff, 1996,68(38):13-16.
  • 5[4]Owens, et al.[J].J Anim Sci,1998,76:275-286.
  • 6[5]Martin, et al. [A].Proc 29th Annu Ga Nutr Conf Feed Ind [C].1992.28-38.
  • 7[6]Nocek, et al. [J].J Dairy Sci,1997,80:1005-1028.
  • 8[7]Styler, et al. [J].J Anim Sci,1976,43:910.
  • 9[8]Mackie, et al.[J].J Agric Sci,1984,103:416.
  • 10[9]Mackie, et al. [J].Appl Environ Microbiol,1979,38:422.

共引文献65

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部