期刊文献+

干旱胁迫对不同大麻品种生理特性和生长的影响研究初报 被引量:19

Preliminary Study on Effects of Drought Stress on Physiological Characteristics and Growth of Different Hemp Cultivars (Cannabis Sativa L.)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对4个不同地域来源的大麻品种:云麻1号、BM001、皖大麻1号和信阳1号的盆栽干旱胁迫试验,研究了不同程度干旱胁迫对这4个大麻品种生理特性和生长的影响。结果表明:1、云麻1号和皖大麻1号的叶片含水量分别在干旱胁迫前期和后期下降幅度较大,BM001和信阳1号的叶片含水量在干旱胁迫中呈持续下降状态,说明不同的大麻品种对干旱胁迫的响应模式不同;2、在土壤含水量低于15%时,四种大麻叶片保护酶活性骤降,说明15%的土壤含水量可作为大麻抗旱栽培措施的临界点;3、干旱胁迫对BM001的株高和茎粗生长影响较其他3种品种小,说明这一品种的抗旱能力较强,可用于大麻抗旱品种的选育。 Based on experiment of pot-cultivating under different degree of drought stress for 4 hemp cultivars: Yunma 1, BM001, Wandama 1 and Xinyang 1, their drought tolerance, including physiological characteristics and growth, were comprehensively evaluated and compared. The results showed that: 1) Leaf relative water content of Yunma 1 and Wandama 1 were declined fast in earlier stage and later stage of drought stress respectively. For BM001 and Xinyang 1, leaf water content decreased constantly during the whole stage of drought stress. It indicated that different hemp cultivars had different response mechanism to drought tolerance. 2) The protective enzyme activities of 4 hemp cultivars sharply declined when water content of soil was below 15%, indicated that this percentage of water content was a critical point for cultivating hemp. 3) Compared with the other three hemp cultivars, BM001 could tolerate a higher degree of drought stress for its plant height and stem diameter were least effected, which indicated that BM001 could be used for breeding the drought resistance varieties.
出处 《中国麻业科学》 2011年第5期235-239,共5页 Plant Fiber Sciences in China
基金 国家麻类产业技术体系亚麻大麻栽培(CARS-19-E14)
关键词 大麻 干旱胁迫 生理特性 Cannabis Sativa L drought stress physiological traits
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1邓振镛,董安祥,郝志毅,张毅,尹宪志.干旱与可持续发展及抗旱减灾技术研究[J].气象科技,2004,32(3):187-190. 被引量:41
  • 2倪郁,李唯.作物抗旱机制及其指标的研究进展与现状[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2001,36(1):14-22. 被引量:76
  • 3Amalo K, Chen G X, Asade K, et al. Separate assays specific for ascorbateperoxidase and guaiaeol peroxidase and for the chloroplastic andcytosolic isozymes of ascorbate peroxidase in plants[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 1994, 35(3): 497-504.
  • 4Cotia Nunes, Susana de Sousa Araujo, Jorge Marques da Silva, et al. Physiological responses of the legume model Medieago truneatula CV.Jemalong to water deficit[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2008,63 : 289-296.
  • 5陈立松,刘星辉.作物抗旱鉴定指标的种类及其综合评价[J].福建农业大学学报,1997,26(1):48-55. 被引量:105
  • 6陈善福,舒庆尧.植物耐干旱胁迫的生物学机理及其基因工程研究进展[J].植物学通报,1999,16(5):555-560. 被引量:192
  • 7Lei Y B, Yin C Y, Li C Y, et al.Differences in some morphological,physiological, and biochemical responses to drought stress in two contrasting populations of Populus przewalskii[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2006, 127(2): 182- 191.
  • 8汤章成.植物对水分胁迫的反应和适应性.植物生理学通讯,:24-29.
  • 9Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stresstolerance[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2002, 7: 405-410.
  • 10Frazeli F, Ghorbanli M, Niknam V, et al. Effect of droughton biomass, protein content, lipid zeroxidation and antioxidant enzymes in two sesame eultivars[J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2007, 51 (1): 98-103.

二级参考文献95

共引文献401

同被引文献234

引证文献19

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部