期刊文献+

亲属活体肾移植供者术后应对方式及影响因素调查 被引量:1

Investigation on the coping mode and influencing factors of the relative living donor of kidney transplantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解亲属活体肾移植供者术后应对方式及其影响因素。方法采用医学应对问卷(MCMQ)和观察访谈法,以便利抽样法,对符合入选标准的亲属活体肾移植供者52例进行调查。结果研究对象的面对得分与常模相似,组间差异无统计学意义(t=1.462,P〉0.05);回避得分(t=2.320,P〈0.05)、屈服得分(t=3.065,P〈0.05)均高于常模,组间比较差异均具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。亲属肾移植受者未来的健康状况、经济负担、孤肾生存的危险等是影响供者应对方式的主要因素。结论护理人员在准确评估亲属活体肾移植供者术后应对方式的基础上,采取针对性的护理措施,最大限度地帮助供者走出应对误区,最终提高生存质量。’ Objective To investigate the coping style and influencing factors of the relative living donor of kidney transplantation. Methods Medical coping modes questionnaire (MCMQ) and observation-interview were performed by sampling survey. 52 case of relative living donor of kidney transplantation according to the adopted standard were analyzed. Results The confronting score of all the cases were close to that of normal model ( t = 1. 462, P 〉0. 05 ), but the avoiding score ( t =3. 320, P 〈 0. 05 ) and yielding score ( t = 3. 065, P 〈0. 05 ) were significantly increased. The prospective health conditions of the relative donors, economic burden and the survival risk of unilateral renal were the main factors affecting the coping style of the recipients. Conclusions Based on the accurate evaluation of the coping style, nursing intervention should be aimed at the relative living donor of kidney transplantation, which might help the donors to create a correct coping style and improve the outcome and life quality of donors.
机构地区 解放军第三
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2011年第26期3134-3137,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 亲属活体肾移植 供体 应对方式 影响因素 Relative living kidney transplantation Donor Coping style Influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献49

共引文献1864

同被引文献13

  • 1贺志军.临床肾移植进展[J].医学临床研究,2004,21(7):705-708. 被引量:8
  • 2陈正,潘光辉,廖德怀,等.老年活体亲属供肾移植的安全性分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(1):21-25.
  • 3Agerskov H1, Bistmp C, Ludvigsen MS, Pedersen BD. Living kidney donation: considerations and decision-making [J]. J Ren Care, 2014, 40 (2): 88-95.
  • 4Rnssweiler JJ, Wiesel M, Carl S, et al. Laparoscopic living donor nephreetomy: personal experiences and review of the literature [J]. Umlnge, 2001 (4) : 485 - 492.
  • 5Shilling LM, Norman ML, Chavin KD, et al. Heahhearc professionals' perceptions of the barriers to living donor kidney transplantation among Afican Americans [J]. J Nail Med Assoc, 2006, 98 (6): 834-840.
  • 6Dew MA, Jacoba CL, Jowsey SG. Guidelines for the psychosocial evaluation of living unrelated kidney donors in the United States [J]. American Journal of Transplantation, 2007, 7 (5) : 1047 - 1054.
  • 7Clemens KK, Thiessan -Philbrook H, Parikh CR, et al. Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR) Network. Psychosocial health of living kidney do- nors: a systematic review [J]. Am J Transplant, 2006, 6:2965 -2977.
  • 8Nejatisafa AA, Mortaz - Hedjri S, Malakoutian T, et al. Quality of life and life events of living unrelated kidney donors in Iran: a muhicenter study [J]. Transplantation, 2008, 86 : 937 - 940.
  • 9Thiel G T, Nolte C, Tsinalis D. Gender imbalance in living kidney donation in Switzerland [J]. Transplant Proc, 2005, 37 (2) : 592 -594.
  • 10Karrfelt HM, Berg UB, Lindblad. Renal transplantation in children: psycho- logical and donation - related aspects from the parental perspective [ J ]. Pediatr Transplant, 2000, 4 (4) : 305 -312.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部