财政分权与环境污染:碳排放的视角被引量：292

Fiscal Decentralization and Environmental Pollution: From the Perspective of Carbon Emission

导出

摘要本文从碳排放的角度,利用1998—2008年省级面板数据分析了财政分权与环境污染的关系。研究发现,财政分权与碳排放存在正相关关系,分权度的提高不利于碳排放量的减少,这说明财政分权可能会降低地方政府对碳排放管制的努力。提高产业研发强度有利于碳排放的降低,但贸易开放度的提高不利于碳排放量的减少。本文还发现,财政分权对碳排放的影响在不同能源消费结构,不同地理区位,不同环境政策的省份之间存在显著差异。此外,财政分权导致碳排放增加的影响途径主要是第二、第三产业。 This paper studies the relationship between fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution from the perspective of carbon emission, using provincial-level dynamic panel data from 1998 to 2008. It shows that there is positive correlated relationship between fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution, the increase of fiscal decentralization level doesn＇t help to reduce carbon emission. It is shows that local governments may not do their efforts to control carbon emissions for fiscal decentralization. The increase of R＆D may help improve the reducing of carbon emissions, but when the opening extent of trade becomes higher, the negative impact on reduction of carbon emission made by fiscal decentralization will be decreased. The impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emission varies greatly among provinces there are different energy consumption structure, different geographical location, and different environmental policy. The influence of fiscal decentralization increasing the carbon emission is through secondary industry and tertiary industry.

作者张克中王娟崔小勇

机构地区华中科技大学管理学院中央财经大学中国经济与管理研究院

出处《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第10期65-75,共11页 China Industrial Economics

基金国家社会科学基金项目"基于亲贫式增长的农村公共支出结构研究"(批准号09BJL034) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"基于主观满意度的农村公共支出结构优化研究"(批准号09YJA790078) 国家自然科学基金项目"多部门框架下政府政策的评价方法及其应用研究"(批准号71103208)

关键词财政分权碳排放环境污染 fiscal decentralization carbon emission environmental pollution

分类号 F124.5 [经济管理—世界经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1Alistair Ulph. Harmonization and Optimal Environmental Policy in a Federal System with Asymmetric Information [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2000,39(2).
2Pranab K, Bardhan. Decentralization of Governance and Development [J]. Journal of Economic Perspective,2002, 16(4).
3Daniel C. Esty. Revitalizing Environmental Federalism[J]. Michigan Law Review, 1996, (95).
4Gene M. Grossman, and Alan B. Krueger. Economic Growth and the Environment [J], Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995,110(2).
5Hilary Sigman. Decentralization and Environmental Quality: An International Analysis of Water Pollution[R]. NBER, Working Paper,2009.
6Miteh Kunce, and Jason Shogren. Destructive Interjurisdictional Competition: Firm, Capital, and Labor Mobility in A Model of Direct Emission Control[J]. Ecological Economics,2007,60(3).
7Olivier Blanchard, and Andrei Shleifer. Federalism with and without Political Centralization: China versus Russia[J]. IMF Staff Papers,2001,48(4).
8Per G. Fredriksson, John A. List, and Daniel L. Millimet. Bureaucratic Corruption, Environmental Policy and Inbound US FDI: Theory and Evidence[J]. Journal of Public Economics,2003,87(7-8).
9Libo Wu, Shinji Kaneko, and Shunji Matsuoka. Driving Forces Behind the Stagnancy of China's Energy-related CO2 Emissions from 1996 to 1999: The Relative Importance of Structural Change, Intensity Change and Scale Change[J]. Energy Policy, 2005,33(3).
10Yingyi Qian, and Gerard Roland. Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint [J]. The American Economic Review, 1998, 88(5).