摘要
既往对既判力的研究,侧重其安定性功能,目的是批判抗诉再审与既判力的冲突。其实,赋予确定裁判以既判力的依据是审判中法院已经给予当事人充分的程序保障,法院在发现事实上也已经作出积极努力。再审只是冲破不具备正当性的虚假既判力,既判力与再审制度之冲破虚假的既判力存在一致性。抗诉再审又与通常程序中程序瑕疵、实体瑕疵的祛除有一定的差异,这一差异要求必须以谦抑原则作为民事检察监督制度的基本原则。
To Criticize the re-trail system,The theories of res judicata concentrated on the function of res judicata. In fact the basis of res judicata is that the partys had been had sufficent procudurial rights,the court had tried it＇s best to find fact. The re-rial system braks through the false res judicata , which had not legitimacy. And the the re-trial system is consistented with res judicata. But there-trial system is different with the flaw remove in common procedure. So we should insist the rule of carefulness to construct the civil procuratorial system.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第11期29-35,共7页
Hebei Law Science
基金
2009年教育部人文社会科学规划项目《民事执行检察监督》(09YJA820043)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
既判力
依据
抗诉
谦抑原则
res judicata
basis
protest action
rule of carefulness
