期刊文献+

机构持股、特质风险与股票收益的实证研究 被引量:18

An Empirical Study on Institutional Ownership,Idiosyncratic Risk and Stock Returns
原文传递
导出
摘要 机构投资者的投资行为对股票市场的风险与收益产生了极大的影响,机构投资者的大量参与有助于股票市场的稳定、特质风险的分散以及超额收益的减少。文章选取机构投资者持股占股票市值比例这一指标来刻画机构投资者的行为,检验机构持股比例、特质风险和股票收益之间的关系。实证发现,在中国股市,特质风险与股票收益呈显著的正相关关系;机构大量持股有助于降低股票的特质风险;机构投资者持股比例越低的股票,特质风险越大,股票预期收益越高。 The investment behavior of institutional investors has a tremendous impact on the stock market's risks and returns, the active participation of institutional investors in the stock market improves the stability of the market, the diversification of idiosyncratic risk and reduction in excess returns. We use the ratio of institutional investors' holding to the total stock market capitalization to characterize the behavior of institutional investors, to test the relationship between the percentage of institutional ownership, idiosyncratic risk and stock returns. In China's stock market, idiosyncratic risk and stock returns have significant positive relation; institutions holding large stocks contribute to the reduction of idiosyncratic risk; the lower the proportion of institutional investors' holding, the higher the stocks' have greater idiosyncratic risk and expected returns.
作者 田益祥 刘鹏
出处 《投资研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第8期79-88,共10页 Review of Investment Studies
关键词 特质风险 股票收益 机构投资者 Idiosyncratic risk Stock returns Institutional investors
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献129

  • 1汪炜,周宇.中国股市“规模效应”和“时间效应”的实证分析——以上海股票市场为例[J].经济研究,2002,37(10):16-21. 被引量:94
  • 2Merton R C.A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information[J].Journal of Finance,1987,42(3).
  • 3Ang A,Hodrick R J,Xing Y,et al.The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns[J].Journal of Finance,2006,61(1).
  • 4Ang A,Hodrick R J,Xing Y,et al.High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns:International and Further U.S.Evidence(Jan 24,2008)[R].Journal of Financial Economics forthcoming,NBER Working Paper No.w13739,Available at SSRN:http∥ssrn.com/abstract=1086991.
  • 5杨华蔚 韩立岩 李东辉.高风险一定有高回报吗?--基于中国证券市场特质波动率的实证研究.中国金融评论,2007,1(2).
  • 6Amihud Y.Illiquidity and Stock Returns:Cross-section and Time-series Effects[J].Journal of Financial Markets,2002,5(1):31-56.
  • 7Lesmond D A,Ogden J P,Trzcinka C A.A New Estimate of Transaction Costs[J].Review of Financial Studies,1999,12(5):1113-1141.
  • 8Hou K W,Moskowitz T.Market Frictions,Price Delay,and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns[J].Review of Financial Studies,2005,18(3):981-1020.
  • 9Bali T G,Cakici N.Idiosyncratic Volatility and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns[J].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2008,43(1).
  • 10Ali A,Hwang L,Trombley M A.Arbitrage Risk and the Book-to-market Anomaly[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2003,69(2):355-373.

共引文献528

同被引文献257

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部