期刊文献+

民主治理的绩效评价维度:基于民主质量理论的建构 被引量:1

Performance Evaluation Dimensions to Democracy Governance:Construction Based on the Theory of Democracy Quality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 民主治理绩效评价体系的建立对于中国民主政治建设具有重要的实践价值。西方政治学者近年来提出的民主质量理论则为民主治理绩效评价体系奠定了规范性的理论基础。民主质量理论包括了民主质量的内涵、评估的原则和民主质量评估的维度及指标。民主质量评估的维度主要由法治、竞争、参与、纵向责任、横向责任、平等、自由和回应度构成。依据民主质量理论的内容所构建的民主质量评估体系对建立适宜于中国民主实践的民主治理绩效评价体系有重要的理论借鉴意义。 It is very important to establish a performance evaluation system of democracy governance for China's democracy. The quality of democracy theory which is brought forward by the west politicians could establish a academic foundation for the performance evaluation system of democracy governance. The theory of the quality of democracy includes connotation, princi- ples, evaluation dimensions and evaluation indicators. The evaluation dimensions of the democracy quality are comprised of the rule of law, participation, competition, vertical accountability, horizontal accountability, freedom, equality and responsiveness. The performance evaluation system of democracy governance based on the theory of the quality of democracy can enlighten us to establish a set of performance evaluation system of democracy governance which is the same with Chinese political environments.
作者 王菁
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2011年第12期89-95,共7页 East China Economic Management
基金 成都理工大学2010年高层次人才科研项目"民主巩固理论研究"(XM0033) 成都理工大学"优秀创新团队培育计划"资助项目
关键词 民主治理 民主质量 绩效评价 评估指标 democracy governance quality of democracy performance evaluation evaluation indicators
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Dirk Berg-Schlosser. The Quality of Post-Communist Democ- racy [C]//Stephen White, Judy Batt, Paul G Lewis. Develop- ments in Central and East European Politics 4.Palgrave Mac- millan, 2007 : 264-275.
  • 2Marc F Plattner. A Skeptical Perspective [ C ]//Larry Diamond , Leonardo Morlino. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Balti- more : The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005 : 77.
  • 3Larry Diamond, Leonardo Morlino. The Quality of Democracy: An Overview [ J ]. Journal of Democracy, 2004,15 (4) : 20-41.
  • 4许耀桐,景跃进(专家点评).中国民主发展模式的“五大”特色[J].人民论坛,2007(8):24-26. 被引量:5
  • 5Philippe C Schmitter. The Ambiguous Virtues of Accountabili- ty [C]// Larry Diamond, Leonardo Morlino. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Universi- ty Press, 2005.
  • 6Guillermo O' Donnell. Why The Rule of Law Matters [ C ]//Lar- ry Diamond, Leonardo Morlino. Assessing the Quality of De- mocracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005 : 3-17.
  • 7Dietrich Rueschemeyer. Addressing Inequality [C ]//Larry Di- amond, Leonardo Morlino. Assessing the Quality of Democra- cy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005: d7-61.
  • 8G Bingham Powell. The Chain of Responsiveness [C]//Larry Diamond, Leonardo Morlino. Assessing the Quality of Democ- racy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005: 62-76.
  • 9Guillermo O' Donnell. Horizontal Accountability in New De- mocracies [C]// Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, Marc F Plattner. The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountabili- ty in New Democracies. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner, 1999: 31.
  • 10俞可平.中国治理变迁30年(1978—2008)[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2008,48(3):5-17. 被引量:263

二级参考文献60

共引文献503

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部